MASS PEACETIME NATURAL CATASTROPHES/DISASTERS
(see also emergency medicine, non-governmental organizations (NGO), and war)

Table of contents :


  • volcanic eruptions
  • storm
  • mass movements
  • earthquake
  • tidal wave
  • tsunami
  • wildfire
  • icebergs
  • cadaver management
  • disaster victim identification

  • Catastrophic events share characteristic nonlinear behaviors that are often generated by cross-scale interactions and feedbacks among system elements. These events result in surprises that cannot easily be predicted based on information obtained at a single scale. Progress on catastrophic events has focused on one of the following two areas: nonlinear dynamics through time without an explicit consideration of spatial connectivityor spatial connectivity and the spread of contagious processes without a consideration of cross-scale interactions and feedbacksref. These approaches rarely have ventured beyond traditional disciplinary boundaries. An interdisciplinary, conceptual, and general mathematical framework for understanding and forecasting nonlinear dynamics through time and across space has been proposed. Decisions that minimize the likelihood of catastrophic events must be based on cross-scale interactions, and such decisions will often be counterintuitive. Given the continuing challenges associated with global change, approaches that cross disciplinary boundaries to include interactions and feedbacks at multiple scales are needed to increase our ability to predict catastrophic events and develop strategies for minimizing their occurrence and impactsref.
    Dilley and colleagues at the World Bank broke down the most of the globe into 8 million grid cells of about 25 km2 each. They then mapped the risks of human and economic damage from 6 types of disaster, such as cyclones and landslides, on to each one and built up a picture of the world's most exposed placesref. The world's most vulnerable countries include Bangladesh, Nepal, Burundi, Haiti and Taiwan. In these places, > 90% of people are at 'high risk' of death for 2 or more types of disaster. The researchers define high-risk areas as having the top 30% of risk compared with other areas of the world. Although many of these areas were already known to be in danger, the report provides a more sophisticated way to compare risks across countries and regions, allowing governments and aid agencies to prioritize their resources. Much of the damage and death that disasters cause is preventable: by building earthquake-proof structures, for example. But repeated hits lock many of the world's developing countries into a cycle that makes it difficult to fund changes, especially as much aid goes into immediate relief efforts. The World Bank plans to use its hotspot map to identify those countries most in need and help them implement a preventive, rather than reactive, approach to disasters. Its approach is already affecting homeowners in Turkey, who must weather frequent earthquakes. When providing aid, the World Bank requires them to buy insurance for their homes. This shifts the responsibility for safe buildings from the government to the individual and private-sector insurance companies. The World Bank also intends to encourage governments to invest in measures such as flood embankments and cyclone shelters by granting loans to countries who plan for disasters. Countries have already started to request money specifically for risk management, indicating that the message is getting through. We must stop making it more complicated than it is : if you want to reduce problems after disasters, you just have to protect people by giving them better housing, better education and better health services.