-
postvaricella purpura
fulminans is a rare disease in children that is probably caused by
an acquired protein S deficiency resulting from antiprotein S antibodies
after HHV-3
/ VZV
infection. The epitope of these antibodies are situated on both the first
242 amino acids of protein S and the sex hormone binding globulin-like
domain.
-
disseminated intravascular
coagulopathy (DIC) / intravascular coagulation-fibrinolysis (ICF)
Aetiology :
-
acute/subacute DIC :
-
infections :
-
obstetric complications :
-
hematological neoplasia
-
large tissue damage
-
burns
-
hyperthermia
-
cerebral trauma
-
crushing injury
-
rhabdomyolysis
-
chronic DIC :
Pathogenesis : excess of tissue
factor
in peripheral blood and systemic inflammation (IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-a)
=> uncontrolled generation of thrombin => massive systemic intravascular
activation of coagulation, leading to =>
-
widespread deposition of fibrin in the circulation which can compromise
the blood supply to various organs, thus contributing to multiple organ
failure
-
consumption of platelets and coagulation proteins resulting from the ongoing
coagulation => severe bleedingref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4,
ref5,
ref6.
However, DIC is not a disease itself but is always secondary to an underlying
disorderref1,
ref2.
In fact, a variety of clinical conditions may cause systemic activation
of coagulation. Table 1 lists the diseases most frequently associated with
DIC. Bacterial infections, in particular septicemia, are the most common
clinical conditions associated with DIC. There is no difference in the
incidence of DIC in patients with Gram-negative or Gram-positive sepsis.
Systemic infections by other micro-organisms, such as viruses and parasites,
may also lead to DIC. The generalized activation of coagulation occurring
in these cases is mediated by cell membrane components of micro-organisms
(lipopolysaccharide or endotoxin) or bacterial exotoxins, such as staphylococcal
b
hemolysin, which cause a generalized inflammatory response through the
activation of pro-inflammatory cytokinesref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4,
ref5.
Severe trauma and burns are other conditions frequently associated with
DICref1,
ref2.
Both solid and hematologic cancers may be associated with DIC, which can
complicate up to 15% of cases of metastasized tumors or acute leukemiaref1,
ref2,
ref3.
DIC is also a frequent complication (occurring in > 50% of cases) of some
obstetric conditions such as abruptio placentae and amniotic fluid embolismref1,
ref2.
Finally, selected vascular disorders, such as giant hemangiomas and large
aortic aneurysms, and severe toxic or immunological reactions (snake bites,
drugs, hemolytic transfusion reactions and transplant rejection) can be
associated with DICref1,
ref2.
Most of the recent advances in our understanding ofthe pathogenesis
of DIC are derived from studies in animal models and humans with severe
sepsisref.
These studies have demonstrated that the systemic formation of fibrin observed
in this setting is the result of the simultaneous coexistence of 4 different
mechanisms: increased thrombin generation, a suppression of the physiologic
anticoagulant pathways, impaired fibrinolysis and activation of the inflammatory
pathwayref1,
ref2,
ref3.
The systemic generation of thrombin has been shown to be mediated predominantlyby
the extrinsic (factor VIIa) pathway. In fact, while the abrogation of the
tissue factor/factor VIIa pathway resulted in complete inhibition of thrombin
generation in experimental animal models of endotoxemia, the inhibition
of the contact system did not prevent systemic activation of coagulationref1,
ref2.
Impaired function of physiological anticoagulant pathways may amplify thrombin
generation and contribute to fibrin formationref.
Plasma levels of antithrombin are markedly reduced in septic patients as
a result of a combination of increased consumption by the ongoing formation
of thrombin, enzyme degradation by elastase released from activated neutrophils,
impaired synthesis due to liver failure and vascular capillary leakageref1,
ref2,
ref3.
Likewise, there may be significant depression of the protein C system,
caused by enhanced consumption, impaired liver synthesis, vascular leakage
and a down-regulation of thrombomodulin expression on endothelial cells
by pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-? and
interleukin(IL)-1?ref1,
ref2,
ref3.
Moreover, the evidence that administration of rTFPI results in complete
inhibition of endotoxin-induced thrombin generation suggests that tissue
factor is involved in the pathogenesis of DICref1,
ref2.
Although no acquired or deficiency or functional defect of TFPI has been
identified in patients with DIC, there is evidence that the inhibitor does
not regulate tissue factor activity sufficiently in such patientsref.
As regards impaired fibrinolysis, experimental models of bacteremia and
endotoxemia are characterized by rapidly increasing fibrinolytic activity,
most probably due to the release of plasminogen activators from endothelial
cells. However, this initialhyperfibrinolytic response is followed by an
equally rapid suppression of fibrinolytic activity, due to the increase
in plasma levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1)ref1,
ref2
[Levi M, van der Poll T, de Jonge E, ten Cate H: Relative insufficiency
of fibrinolysis in disseminated intravascular coagulation. Sepsis 2000,
3:103-109]. The importance of PAI-1 in the pathogenesis of DIC is further
demonstrated by the fact that a functional mutation in the PAI-1 gene,
the 4G/5G polymorphism, which causes increased plasma levels of PAI-1,
was linked to a worse clinical outcome in patients with meningococcal septicemiaref.
Finally, another important mechanism in the pathogenesis of DIC is the
parallel and concomitant activation of the inflammatory cascade mediated
by activated coagulation proteins, which in turn can stimulate endothelial
cells to synthesize pro-inflammatory cytokines. In fact, while cytokines
and inflammatory mediators can induce coagulation, thrombin and other serine
proteasesinteract with protease-activated receptors on cell surfaces to
promote further activation and additional inflammationref.
Furthermore, since activated protein C has an anti-inflammatory effect
through its inhibition of endotoxin-induced production of TNF-?, IL-1?,
IL-6 and IL-8 by cultured monocytes/macrophages, depression of the protein
C system may result in a pro-inflammatory stateref.
Thus, inflammatory and coagulation pathways interact with each other in
a vicious circle which amplifies the response further and leads to dysregulated
activation of systemic coagulation (van der Poll T, Buller HR, ten Cate
H: Activation of coagulation after administration of tumor necrosis factor
to normal subjects. N Eng J Med 1990, 322:1622-1627). Table 2 summarizes
the most important mechanisms in the pathogenesis of DIC in sepsis. However,
there is evidence that various events, including the release of tissue
material (fat, phospholipids, cellular enzymes) into the circulation, hemolysis
and endothelial damage may promote the systemic activation of coagulation
in severe trauma and burns through a mechanism similar to that observed
in septic patients (i.e., systemic activation of cytokines)ref1,
ref2.
Nevertheless, there may also be specific variations in the pathogenesis
if DIC due to different underlying disorders. For example, in some patients
with cancer the initiation of coagulation activation is not only due to
tissue factor expression on the surface of the malignant cells but in this
case also involves a specific cancer procoagulant, a cysteine protease
with factor X activating propertiesref.
Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia have a peculiar form of DIC
characterized by a severe hyperfibrinolytic state associated with systemic
activation of coagulationref.
The most common clinical manifestations of DIC are bleeding, thrombosis
or both, often resulting in dysfunction of one or more organsref
[Bick RL: Disseminated intravascular coagulation: objective clinical and
laboratory diagnosis, treatment and assessment of therapeutic response.
Semin Thromb Haemost 1996, 22:69-88]. A schematic representation of the
clinical manifestations of coagulation abnormalities in DIC is presented
in Figure 1. Since no single laboratory test or set of tests is sensitive
or specific enough to allow a definite diagnosis of DIC, in most cases
the diagnosis is based on the combination of results of laboratory investigations
in a patient with a clinical condition known to be associated with DICref1,
ref2.
The classical characteristic laboratory findings include prolonged clotting
times (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin
time), increased levels of fibrin-related markers (fibrin degradation products
[FDP], D-dimers), low platelet count and fibrinogen levels and low plasma
levels of coagulation factors (such as factors V and VII) and coagulation
inhibitors (such as antithrombin and protein C)ref1,
ref2.
However, the sensitivity of plasma fibrinogen levels for the diagnosis
of DIC is low, since fibrinogen acts as an acute-phase reactant and its
levels are often within the normal range for a long period of time. Thus,
hypofibrinogenemia is frequently detected only in very severe cases of
DICref1,
ref2.
On the other hand, FDP and D-dimer levels have a low specificity since
many other conditions, such as trauma, recent surgery, inflammation or
venous thromboembolism, are associated with elevated levels of these fibrin-related
markers. Other, more specialized and useful tests, not available in all
laboratories, include the measurement of soluble fibrin and assays of thrombin
generation, such as those to detect prothrombin activation fragments F1+2
or thrombin-antithrombin complexesref1,
ref2.
However, serial coagulation tests may bemore helpful than single laboratory
results in establishing the diagnosis of DIC. A scoring system for the
diagnosis of DIC, developed from a previously described set of diagnostic
criteriaref,
has been proposed by the Scientific Subcommittee on DIC of the International
Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH)ref1,
ref2.
This system consists of a 5-step diagnostic algorithm, in which a specific
score, reflecting the severity of the abnormality found, is given to each
of the following laboratory tests: platelet count (>100 × 109/L
= 0; <100 × 109/L = 1, <50 × 109/L
= 2), elevated fibrin-related markers (e.g. soluble fibrin monomers/fibrin
degradation products) (no increase = 0; moderate increase = 2; strong increase
= 3), prolonged prothrombin time (< 3 sec. = 0; > 3 sec. but < 6
sec. = 1; > 6 sec. = 2), fibrinogen level (> 1 g/L = 0; < 1 g/L = 1).
A total score of 5 or more is considered to be compatible with DIC. According
to recent observations, the sensitivity and specificity of this scoring
system are high (more than 90%)ref.
However, an essential condition for the use of this algorithm is the presence
of an underlying disorder known to be associated with DICref.
Finally, a scoring system for diagnosing non-overt DIC has recently been
proposed by the ISTH Scientific Subcommittee and validated by Toh and Downey
who demonstrated its feasibility and prognostic relevanceref.
Treatment of DIC : the heterogeneity of
the underlying disorders and of the clinical presentations makes the therapeutic
approach to DIC particularly difficultref1,
ref2.
Thus, the management of DIC is based on the treatment of the underlying
disease, supportive and replacement therapies and the control of coagulation
mechanisms. The recent understanding of important pathogenetic mechanisms
that may lead to DIC has resulted in novel preventive and therapeutic approaches
to patients with DICref.
However, in spite of this progress, the therapeutic decisions are still
controversial and should be individualized on the basis of the nature of
DIC and the severity of the clinical symptomsref1,
ref2
[Riewald M, Riess H: Treatment options for clinically recognized disseminated
intravascular coagulation. Semin Thromb Haemost 1998, 24:53-59]. The treatment
for DIC include replacement therapy, anticoagulants, restoration of anticoagulant
pathways and other agentsref1,
ref2,
ref3.
Most of the clinical studies reported in the next paragraphs were conducted
in patients with severe sepsisref1,
ref2,
a condition which usually leads to generalized activation of coagulation
and thus represents an interesting model for the development of new treatment
modalities.
-
a) Replacement therapy : the aim of replacement therapy in DIC is to replace
the deficiency due to the consumptionof platelets, coagulation factors
and inhibitors in order to prevent or arrest the hemorrhagic episodes (Bick
RL: Disseminated intravascular coagulation: objective clinical and laboratory
diagnosis, treatment and assessment of therapeutic response. Semin Thromb
Haemost 1996, 22:69-88). Platelet concentrates and fresh frozen plasma
(FFP) were, in the past, used very cautiously because of the fear that
they might "feed the fire" and worsen thrombosis in patients with active
DIC. However, this fear was not confirmed by clinical practice and nowadays
replacement therapy is a mainstay of the treatment of patients with significant
bleeding and coagulation parameters compatible with DIC. Transfusion of
platelet concentrates at 1–2 U/10 Kg body weight should be considered when
the platelet count is less than 20 × 109/L or if there
is major bleeding and the platelet count is less than 50 × 109/L.
When there is significant DIC-associated bleeding and fibrinogen levels
are below 100 mg/dL, the use of FFP, at a dose of 15–20 mL/Kg, is justified.
Alternatively, fibrinogen concentrates (total dose 2–3 g) or cryoprecipitates
(1 U/10 Kg body weight) may be administered. However, FFP should be preferred
to specific coagulation factor concentrates since the former contains all
coagulation factors and inhibitors deficient during active DIC and lacks
traces of activated coagulation factors, which may instead contaminate
the concentrates and exacerbate the coagulation disorder.
-
b) Anticoagulants : the role of heparin in the treatment of DIC remains
controversialref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4,
ref5
[Hoyle CF, Swisky DM, Freedman L, Hayhoe GFJ: Beneficial effect of heparin
in the management of patients with APL. Br J Hematol 1988, 68:283-289;
Sakuragawa N, Hasegawa H, Maki M, Nakagawa M, Nakashima M: Clinical evaluation
of low-molecular-weight heparin (FR-860) on disseminated intravascular
coagulation (DIC) – a multicenter co-operative double blind trial in comparison
with heparin. Thromb Haemost 1993, 72:475-500; Majumdar G: Idiopathic chronic
DIC controlled with low-molecular-weight heparin Blood Coagul Fibrinol
1996, 7:97-98]. In fact, although from a theoretical point of view interruption
of the coagulation cascade should be of benefit in patients with active
DICref,
the clinical studies carried out so far have not been conclusive and indeed
have often yielded contradictory resultsref.
However, on the basis of the few data available in the literature, heparin
treatment is probably useful in patients with acute DIC and predominant
thromboembolism, such as those with purpura fulminansref1,
ref2.
The use of heparin in chronic DIC is better established and it has been
successfully employed in patients with chronic DIC associated with those
diseases in which recurrent thrombosis predominates, such as solid tumors,
hemangiomas, and dead fetus syndrome (Majumdar G: Idiopathic chronic DIC
controlled with low-molecular-weight heparin. Blood Coagul Fibrinol 1996,
7:97-98). The role of heparin in the treatment of DIC associated with acute
promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is another controversy, since some authors
support its use whereas other studies failed to demonstrate its efficacyref1,
ref2
[Hoyle CF, Swisky DM, Freedman L, Hayhoe GFJ: Beneficial effect of heparin
in the management of patients with APL. Br J Hematol 1988, 68:283-289].
However, the use of heparin in this setting has declined in the last few
years thanks to the introduction of all-trans retinoic acid therapy which
has led to the reduction of APL-associated coagulopathy. Heparin is usually
given at relatively low doses (5–10 U/Kg of body weight per hour) by continuous
intravenous infusion and may be switched to subcutaneous injection for
long-term outpatient therapy (i.e. for those patients with chronic DIC
associated with solid tumors). Alternatively, low-molecular-weight heparin
may be used, as supported by the positive results in both experimental
and clinical DIC studiesref1,
ref2
[Sakuragawa N, Hasegawa H, Maki M, Nakagawa M, Nakashima M: Clinical evaluation
of low-molecular-weight heparin (FR-860) on disseminated intravascular
coagulation (DIC) – a multicenter co-operative double blind trial in comparison
with heparin. Thromb Haemost 1993, 72:475-500; Majumdar G: Idiopathic chronic
DIC controlled with low-molecular-weight heparin. Blood Coagul Fibrinol
1996, 7:97-98]. Experimental and clinical studies have also shown the potential
role of danaparoid sodium, a low molecular weight heparinoid, in the treatment
of DICref1,
ref2,
ref3.
A newer anticoagulant agent with direct thombin inhibitory activity, recombinant
hirudin (r-hirudin)ref1,
ref2,
was recently shown to be effective in treating DIC in animal studies, although
a study of the effect of this thrombin inhibitor in a sheep model of lethal
endotoxemia showed no benefitref.
Preliminary experimental human studies proved that this drug attenuated
endotoxin-induced coagulation activationref.
Since activation of the coagulation cascade during DIC occurs predominantlythrough
the extrinsic pathway, theoretically the inhibition of tissue factor should
block endotoxin-associated thrombin generationref.
In vivo experiments in baboon models of lethal DIC showed that TFPI
is a potent inhibitor of sepsis-related mortalityref.
De Jonge and colleaguesref
first demonstrated in humans that recombinant TFPI dose-dependently inhibits
coagulation activation during endotoxemia. Recombinant TFPI was evaluated
in a phase II randomized trial in patients with severe sepsisref.
Although the study did not have the statistical power to demonstrate a
survival benefit, it did show a trend toward a reduction in 28-day all-cause
mortality together with an improvement in organ dysfunction in the group
of patients treated with the recombinant TFPI. No evidence of a survival
advantage was observed in patients with severe sepsis who received recombinant
TFPI in a recent phase III large clinical trialref.
Inhibition of the tissue factor/factor VIIa pathway is an another strategy
that has been explored. Moons and colleagues demonstrated the efficacy
of recombinant nematode anticoagulant protein c2 (NaPc2), a potent and
specific inhibitor of the ternary complex between tissue factor/factor
VIIa and factor Xa, in inhibiting coagulation activation in a primate model
of sepsisref.
Other authors have experimented with anti-tissue factor/factor VIIa antibodies
in animal models with promising resultsref.
-
c) Restoration of anticoagulant pathways : since patients with active DIC
have an acquired deficiency of coagulation inhibitors, restoration of the
physiologic anticoagulation pathways seems to be an appropriate aim of
the treatment of DICref.
Considering that antithrombin (AT) is the primary inhibitor of circulating
thrombin, its use in DIC is certainly rationalref.
Recent studies in animals and humans with severe sepsis have demonstrated
that antithrombin also has anti-inflammatory properties (reduction of C-reactive
protein and IL-6 levels), which may further justify its utilization during
DICref
[Okajima K, Uchiba M: The anti-inflammatory properties of anti-thrombin
III: new therapeutic implications. Semin Thromb Haemost 1998, 24:27-32].
The administration of antithrombin concentrates infused at supraphysiologic
concentrations was shown to reduce sepsis-related mortality in animal modelsref.
Several small clinical trials have been conducted in humans, mostly in
patients with sepsis-related DIC, and have shown beneficial effects in
terms of improvement of coagulation parameters and organ functionref1,
ref2.
An Italian multicenter, randomized, double-blind study conducted in 1998
by Baudo et al.ref,
evaluating the role of antithrombin in patients with sepsis or post-surgical
complications, showed a net beneficial effect on survival in those patients
receiving the concentrate. These findings were confirmed in 1999 by Levi
et al. in their meta-analysis of all so far published human clinical trials
of antithrombin treatment of DICref.
By contrast, a large randomized, controlled multicenter trial of supraphysiologic
doses of AT concentrates conducted in 2144 patients with sepsis and DIC
did not show a beneficial effect of antithrombin treatmentref.
However, a retrospective analysis of the same trial showed that the subgroup
of patients who did not receive concomitant heparin had a potential benefit
from antithrombin III in terms of mortality reductionref.
Based on the fact that the protein C system is impaired during DIC some
authors have investigated the therapeutic efficacy of exogenous administration
of this protein in patients with DICref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4,
ref5,
ref6,
ref7,
ref8,
ref9,
ref10,
ref11,
ref12
[Bernard GR, Hartman DL, Helterbrand JD, Fisher CJ: Recombinant human activated
protein C (rhAPC) produces a trend toward improvement in morbidity and
28-day survival in patients with severe sepsis. Crit Care Med 1998, 27:S4].
The infusion of activated protein C (APC) concentrates was shown to prevent
DIC and mortality in an animal model of sepsisref.
A study conducted in 1998 on patients with severe sepsis suggested a trend
toward improved survival in the group treated with APC [Bernard GR, Hartman
DL, Helterbrand JD, Fisher CJ: Recombinant human activated protein C (rhAPC)
produces a trend toward improvement in morbidity and 28-day survival in
patients with severe sepsis. Crit Care Med 1998, 27:S4]. In a dose-ranging
clinical trial, 131 patients with sepsis received recombinant human APC
by continuous infusion at doses ranging from 12 mg/Kg/hour
to 30 mg/Kg/hour or placeboref.
A 40% reduction in mortality was observed in those patients who received
the higher doses of activated protein C. Similarly, another recent multicenter
clinical trialref
determined that treatment with recombinant human APC, given intravenously
at a dose of 24 mg/Kg of body weight per hour,
significantly reduced mortality in patients with severe sepsis, in spite
of a higher rate of serious bleeding in the APC-treated group. A double-blind
randomized trial compared the safety and efficacy of APC and unfractionated
heparin in the treatment of DIC and concluded that the former improved
DIC, and finally the survival, more efficiently than did heparinref.
The recently published results of the trial conducted by the Human Recombinant
Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Sepsis (PROWESS) Study Group
showed a significant reduction in 28-day mortality and a quicker resolution
of organ dysfunction in the group of patients with severe sepsis treated
with APCref1,
ref2.
These results were confirmed by the ENHANCE trial which also suggested
that recombinant APC might be more effective is therapy is started earlierref.
By contrast, a very recent trial on 2640 patients with severe sepsis and
a low risk of death (defined by an APACHE II score <25 or single organ
failure) did not find a statistically significant difference in 28-day
mortality rate between the placebo and APC-treated groupsref,
suggesting that APC is of benefit only in patients at high risk of death
from sepsis.Ongoing studies are focusing on the concomitant use of heparin
in
patients with DIC who receive activated protein Cref.
-
d) Other agents : recombinant factor VII activated (rFVIIa) may be used
in patients with severe bleeding who are not responsive to other treatment
options. Bolus doses of 60–120 ?g/Kg, possibly repeated after 2–6 hours,
have been found to be effective in controlling refractory hemorrhagic episodes
associated with DICref1,
ref2.
Antifibrinolytic agents, such as epsilon-aminocaproic acid or tranexamic
acid, given intravenously at a dose of 10–15 mg/Kg/h, are occasionally
used in patients resistant to replacement therapy who are bleeding profusely
or in patients with disease states associated with intense fibrinolysis
(prostate cancer, Kasabach-Merrit syndrome, acute promyelocytic leukemia)ref.
However, since these agents are very effective in blocking fibrinolysis,
they should not be administered unless heparin has been previously infused
in order to block the prothrombotic component of DIC. The use of these
drugs in APL has declined in the last few years, given the efficacy of
all-trans-retinoic-acid in preventing the majority of the hemorrhagic
complications of this malignancyref.
The advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of DIC have resulted
in novel preventive and therapeutic approaches to this disease. Based on
the fact that tissue inflammation is a fundamental mechanism in DIC associated
with sepsis or major trauma, some researchers have successfully employed
the combined blockade of leukocyte/platelet adhesion and coagulation in
a murine model by using antiselectin antibodies and heparin and have suggested
the potential clinical use of such a strategyref.
Based on the same rationale, other researchers have demonstrated that the
administration of recombinant IL-10, an anti-inflammatory cytokine which
may modulate the activation of coagulation, completely abrogated endotoxin-induced
effects on coagulation in humansref.
By contrast, the use of monoclonal antibodies against tumor necrosis factor
has shown disappointing or at best modest results in septic patientsref1,
ref2,
ref3.
More recently, Branger and colleaguesref
found that an inhibitor of p38 MAPK, an important component of intracellular
signaling cascades that mediate the inflammatory response to infectious
and non-infectious stimuli, attenuated the activation of coagulation, fibrinolysis
and endothelial cells during human endotoxemia. Finally, although studies
using antibodies against the receptor for bacterial endotoxins (CD14) produced
positive resultsref,
other studies using endotoxin antibodies failed to improve outcomeref1,
ref2.
Symptoms & signs : skin and mucous hemorrhages,
shock, metabolic acidosis, ARDS, MOF, thromboses in subacute DIC
Laboratory examinations :
-
no hemolysis
-
reduced antithrombin and protein C
-
[fibrinogen]plasma may initially appear normal because it is
an APP
-
all other [coagulation factors]plasma are decreased
-
enlengthening of both aPTT and INR is due also to inhibition by FDPs
-
paracoagulation test (protamine sulfate or ethanol tests) shows circulating
fibrin monomers
Differential diagnosis :
| |
acute DIC
|
chronic DIC
|
primary fibrinolysis
|
TTP
|
chronic hepatitis
|
| incidence |
common |
common |
very rare |
rare |
common |
| INR |
very increased |
normal or increased |
increased |
normal |
normal or increased |
| aPTT |
very increased |
normal or increased |
increased |
normal |
normal or increased |
fibrinogen |
very reduced |
normal (compensated by chronic inflammation) or reduced |
very reduced |
normal |
reduced, normal or increased |
factor VIII |
reduced |
normal or reduced |
normal or reduced |
normal |
normal |
antithrombin
III |
reduced |
normal or reduced |
reduced |
normal |
reduced |
| euglobulin lysis time |
normal or reduced |
normal or reduced |
very reduced |
normal |
normal |
plasminogen |
reduced |
reduced |
very reduced |
normal |
normal or reduced |
D-dimer |
+++ (> 2,000 mg/ml) |
+ |
+/- |
+/- |
+/- |
| other FDP |
+++ |
+ |
++++ |
|
+/- |
platelets |
very reduced |
normal or reduced (other than in acute
promyelocytic leukemia
with hyperfibrinolysis) |
normal |
very reduced |
normal or reduced |
| RBC alterations |
schistocytosis |
mild schistocytosis |
- |
marked schistocytosis |
frequent macrocytosis |
Other D-dimer elevation : surgery, reabsorbing hematomas, deep venous thrombosis,
pulmonary thrombembolism, liver cirrhosis, renal failure
FDP >15 mg/mL is the most effective to differentiate
leukemia-associated DIC from non-DIC, resulting in diagnostic sensitivity
and specificity of 92% and 96%, respectivelyref.
Therapy :
-
heparin
(in purpura fulminans or limb ischemia : i.v. infusion 300-500 U/hr) until
increase in platelet.
-
antifibrinolytic drugs
in bleeding patients
-
replacement therapy
-
platelet concentrates
(until > 20,000/ml; > 30,000/ml
if active bleeding)
-
fresh frozen
plasma
(15-20 ml/kg until fibrinogen > 100 mg/dl); if uneffective => fibrinogen
concentrates (2-3 g), which unfortunately contain also activated coagulation
factors and do not contain natural coagulation inhibitors
-
antihrombin III
? : high-dose AT without concomitant heparin in septic patients with DIC
may result in a significant mortality reductionref
-
rHu-APC
?
-
gabexate mesilateref
-
tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) ?