Epidemiology
: prevalence of serum antibodies = 3.8% (< 5% in any age group). SV40
seroprevalence rates in the general populations of the USA and other countries
have ranged from 2 to 20%
ref1,
ref2.
However, differences in the methodology and low sensitivity of the assays
used in some studies make it difficult to ascertain the actual prevalence
of SV40 infections. A report by Shah et al.
ref
found that 18% of adult kidney transplant patients had specific neutralizing
antibody to SV40. Another study among adult patients showed the presence
of SV40 neutralizing antibodies in 16% of HIV-infected patients and 11%
of individuals not infected with HIV
ref.
Among hospitalized children, the overall prevalence of specific SV40 serum
neutralizing antibodies was 6%
ref;
the SV40 seropositivity among children increased with age (P = 0.01) and
was significantly associated with kidney transplantation (P < 0.001).
Recently, a study of the prevalence of SV40 infections showed rates of
9% in Hungary and 4% in the Czech Republic
ref.
Females had a higher rate of SV40 antibodies than males, reaching 16% in
Hungary and 8% in the Czech Republic in certain age groups. SV40 infections
were found in similar proportions in both countries among persons not exposed
to potentially contaminated polio vaccines and in subjects vaccinated in
the era of SV40-free vaccines. Minor et al.
ref
recently analyzed over 2,000 sera from the United Kingdom and found an
SV40 seroprevalence rate of just under 5%. Most of the neutralizing titers
were low, and there was no apparent relationship between antibody positivity
and polio vaccine usage. These data suggest that SV40 is being transmitted
in the human population today, probably at a relatively low prevalence
rate. However, conclusions about seroprevalence rates should be viewed
with caution, as very little is known about the human immune response to
SV40 infections. Molecular studies of adult patients with renal disease
and recipients of kidney transplants found that SV40 cytopathic effects
developed in CV-1 cells cocultured with urinary cells or PBMCs from those
patients
ref1,
ref2.
SV40 sequences were detected by PCR in kidney biopsies from 56% of patients
with
focal
segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS)
(found also in brain and urine)
ref1,
ref2.
SV40 DNA was localized to renal tubular epithelial cell nuclei in renal
biopsies of patients with FSGS as determined by
in situ hybridization.
In addition, studies showed that SV40 DNA sequences from the viral regulatory
region were detected and identified in the allografts of immunocompromised
pediatric
renal
transplants
recipients
ref1,
ref2
and in the native kidney of a young adult lung transplant patient with
polyomavirus nephropathy
ref.
Different studies have detected SV40 DNA sequences in PBMCs from various
patient populations
ref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4,
ref5,
ref6.
These results demonstrate the nephrotropic and lymphotropic properties
of SV40 and indicate that the kidney can serve as a reservoir for the virus
in humans. It appears that patients with acquired and/or iatrogenic immunosuppression
are a population at risk for SV40. However, the frequency, natural history,
and morbidity of the virus in this increasing patient population are unclear.
Large prospective studies using sensitive and specific reagents for SV40
are needed to determine the prevalence of viral infections in the general
population and to define groups of individuals at elevated risk for this
emerging pathogen. Similarly important is the need for prospective longitudinal
studies that address the morbidity and related mortality of these infections.
The use of serologic tests alone may not be the most reliable way to conduct
these studies. An enzyme immunoassay method for detection of SV40 antibodies
in humans recognizes cross-reactivity between SV40, BKV, and JCV, complicating
interpretation of assay results
ref.
Similar limitations have been found in serologic methods for identification
of human infection with
herpes
B virus (Cercopithecine herpesvirus 1)
,
which is known also to naturally infect rhesus macaques (
M. mulatta)
ref.
Because infection with B virus in humans results in fatal encephalomyelitis
or severe neurologic impairment, rapid and conclusive diagnosis is critical
in order to control sequelae by this viral pathogen. Serologic assays (including
enzyme immunoassay) for B-virus infection in humans are limited by low
sensitivity and specificity
ref.
Currently, cell culture for the 3 polyomaviruses known to infect humans
(JCV, BKV, and SV40) is rarely helpful in establishing diagnosis of infection
because of slow viral growth and the requirement for specialized cell lines
ref.
Serologic assays may be useful for retrospective epidemiological analysis,
but they are of minimal use for diagnosis or therapeutic decisions because
most overt polyomavirus infections are believed to result from reactivation
of latent infections
ref.
Therefore, the use of modern molecular biology assays is an excellent and
preferred alternative for the analysis of SV40 infections in the human
population
ref.
In addition, these sensitive and specific techniques are able to provide
insights into the possible infectious etiology of human malignancies
ref1,
ref2,
ref3.
Timeline :
-
1970s-1980s pre-PCR: SV40 and brain cancers
-
1992 SV40 DNA (PCR) and expression of large T-ag in brain cancers
-
1994 SV40 DNA and expression of large T-ag in malignant mesotheliomas
-
1995 Infectious SV40 isolated from a brain cancer of a 4-year-old child
-
1996 SV40 DNA in bone cancers
-
2002 SV40 DNA in lymphomas
-
2002 Institute of Medicine concluded that "SV40 exposure could lead to
cancer in humans under natural conditions"
Genomics : SV40 shares
70% homology with JCV and BKV. Although these viruses are related, they
can be distinguished easily at the DNA and protein levels. Genetic differences,
particularly in the noncoding, regulatory regions of the viral genomes,
may determine important differences in host range. Furthermore, the 3 viruses
can be differentiated serologically by neutralization and hemagglutination
assays
ref.
The circular SV40 DNA genome is represented, with the unique
EcoRI
site shown at map unit 100/0. Nucleotide numbers based on reference strain
SV40-776 begin and end at the origin (Ori) of viral DNA replication (map
unit 0/5243). The ORFs that encode viral proteins are indicated. The early
T-ag proteins are shown on the right, and the late structural (VP) proteins
are shown on the left. The beginning and end of each open reading frame
are indicated by nucleotide numbers
ref
It integrates into
adenovirus/SV40
integration site 1 (ASVS1) :
-
transcription
factor CP2 (TFCP2) recognizes sites within SV40 late promoters
-
transcription
factor AP-2a (TFAP2A) and TEA
domain family member 1 (TEAD1) / SV40 transcriptional enhancer factor
bind to a consensus DNA-binding sequence CCCCAGGC in the SV40 promoter
-
Sp1 transcription
factor recruits SV40 capsid proteins to the viral packaging signal,
ses : a molecular model suggests a VP1(5)-VP2/3-DNA-Sp1 complex
-
SVmiRNAs accumulate at late times in infection, are perfectly complementary
to early viral mRNAs, and target those mRNAs for cleavage. This reduces
the expression of viral T antigens but does not reduce the yield of infectious
virus relative to that generated by a mutant lacking SVmiRNAs. However,
wild-type SV40-infected cells are less sensitive than the mutant to lysis
by cytotoxic T cells, and trigger less cytokine production by such cells.
Thus, viral evolution has taken advantage of the miRNA pathway to generate
effectors that enhance the probability of successful infectionref.
Proteomics : the
SV40 genome is divided into :
-
early region, coding for :
-
17 kDa small T-antigen is not essential for virus replication in
tissue culture, and there is not a uniform requirement for it in SV40 transformation
or tumor induction. However, studies indicate that SV40 small T-ag enhances
large T-ag-mediated transformationref
and is required for complete transformation of human cells in vitroref.
It inhibits cellular PP2A
by complexing with the catalytic subunit and regulatory subunit of the
enzyme. Small T-ag plays a role in the induction of telomerase in SV40-infected
human mesothelial cellsref.
Also, recent data indicate that small T-ag is required by large T-ag to
upregulate Notch1 expression in SV40-infected and -transformed human mesothelial
cells, as well as in SV40-positive human mesotheliomasref.
-
94 kDa large T antigen of SV40 strain 776 contains 708 amino acids
and is a very multifunctional protein. The large T-ag is an essential replication
protein that is required for initiation of viral DNA synthesis and that
also stimulates host cells to enter S phase and undergo DNA synthesis.
Because of this ability to subvert cell cycle control, T-ag represents
the major transforming protein of SV40. T-ag forms complexes with several
cellular proteins; fundamental to T-ag effects on host cells is binding
to cellular tumor suppressor proteinsref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4.
-
SV40 T-ag binding sequesters p53
,
abolishing its function and allowing cells with genetic damage to survive
and enter S phase, leading to an accumulation of T-ag-expressing cells
with genomic mutations that may promote tumorigenic growth
-
pRb
normally binds transcription factor E2F in early G1 of the cell
cycle; T-ag causes unscheduled dissociation of pRb/E2F complexes, releasing
E2F to activate expression of growth-stimulatory genesref1,
ref2
-
T-ag interacts with karyopherin
a4
(importin a3) and karyopherin
a2,
downregulates developmentally
regulated GTP binding protein 2 (DRG2), and recruits PP2A
in a DNA J domain-dependent manner to reduce the phosphorylation of RBL2
/ p130
ref.
These properties help explain SV40's potential as a tumor virus. However,
it is important to point out that the oncogenic capacity of SV40 is an
accidental side effect of the viral replication strategy; viral proteins
(large and small T-ags) in lytically infected cells stimulate host cells
into a state capable of supporting viral replication. Known T-ag functions
are identified in boxes above and below the shaded bar, which represents
the T-ag protein. The numbers given are amino acid residues based on reference
strain SV40-776. The variable domain at the extreme C terminus contains
amino acid differences among viral strains and is used for strain identificationref
SV40 large T-ag variable domains. (a) Schematic of large T-ag, showing
the location of the variable domain. (b) Amino acid changes in the T-ag
C-terminal variable domains of representative SV40 isolates and human primary
brain tumor-associated sequences, compared to that of SV40-776. The rectangular
boxes represent the T-ag C-terminal region from amino acid (aa) 622 to
708. Virus isolates from monkey kidney cells are shown in the left column.
Human brain isolates and primary brain cancer-associated sequences are
in the right column. The numbering is according to the system for SV40-776.
Del., deletion; Ins., insertion. Arrows indicate the positions and types
of amino acid changesref
Although the function of the SV40 T-ag variable domain is not known,
experimental data have suggested that it may be important in some aspect
of the virus-host interaction. Embedded within the variable domain of large
T-ag is a functional domain, which encompasses amino acids 682 to 708,
defined as the host range/adenovirus helper function (hr/hf) domain. A
C-terminal fragment of T-ag can relieve the adenovirus replication block
in monkey cellsref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4,
ref5
by an unknown mechanism. The hr function was identified because T-ag C-terminal
deletion mutants exhibited different growth properties in monkey cell lines;
the deletion mutants grew very poorly in CV-1 cells but grew well in BSC
and Vero cellsref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4.
Viral DNA was replicated to near-wild-type levels in all three cell typesref1,
ref2.
Virions produced by the hr/hf mutants do not assemble properly, seemingly
due to an inability to add VP1 to the 75S assembly intermediatesref.
The helicase-active form of large tumor antigen is a ring-shaped hexamer/double
hexamer, which has a positively charged hexameric channel for interacting
with DNA. On the hexameric channel surface are 6 b-hairpin
structures and loops, emanating from each of the 6 subunits. At the tips
of the -hairpin and the loop structures are 2 ring-shaped residues, H513
and F459, respectively. Additionally, 2 positively charged residues, K512
and K516, are near the tip of the b-hairpin.
The positions of these ring-shaped and positively charged residues suggest
that they may play a role in binding DNA for helicase function. To understand
the roles of these residues in helicase function, a set of mutants was
obtained and various activities, including oligomerization, ATPase, DNA
binding, and helicase activities, were examined. Substitution of these
residues by Ala abolished helicase activity. Extensive mutagenesis showed
that substitutions by ring-shaped residues (W and Y) at position F459 and
by residues with hydrophobic or long aliphatic side chains (W, Y, F, L,
M, and R) at position H513 supported helicase activity. The 4 residues
(F459, H513, K512, and K516) play a critical role in interacting with DNA
for helicase function. The results suggest a possible mechanism to explain
how these residues, as well as the b-hairpin
and the loop structures on which the residues reside, participate in binding
and translocating DNA for origin melting and unwindingref.
-
late region, coding for capsid proteins :
There is only one known serotype of SV40, but genetic strains exist and
can be distinguished by nucleotide differences in the regulatory region
ref
and in the variable domain at the extreme C terminus of T-ag, which is
defined as the last 86 amino acids of the molecule (residues 622 to 708)
ref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4,
ref5,
ref6,
ref7.
Nucleotide differences in the T-ag C-terminal region, including polynucleotide
insertions and deletions as well as single nucleotide changes, would change
some encoded amino acids. These distinctions at the nucleotide and protein
levels have conclusively established that SV40 sequences in human malignancies
and other clinical samples are not the result of accidental laboratory
contamination. However, future studies need to determine whether SV40 strains
differ in pathogenic and/or oncogenic capacity. The classic example of
DNA virus strains differing in oncogenic capacity is the
HPV
group; of the > 75 types described, of which about 30 cause genital infections,
only a few types are associated with the development of cervical carcinoma
ref.
This identification of high-risk strains has led to the development of
preventive interventions, such as the vaccine against HPV type 16
ref.
Laboratory-adapted monkey strains of SV40 typically contain 2 72-bp
enhancer elements; these are designated "
nonarchetypal" or complex
regulatory structures
ref.
In contrast, SV40 isolates from human nonmalignant and malignant specimens
usually (but not always) contain no duplications in the enhancer ("
archetypal"
structure). DNA sequence profiles of SV40 regulatory regions detected in
human kidney transplant recipients. Ori, viral origin of DNA replication
region, which spans nucleotides 5195 to 31; 21-bp repeats, GC-rich region
between nucleotides 40 and 103; 72, 72-bp sequence within the enhancer
region that is duplicated in some monkey strains (e.g., reference strain
SV40-776). Nucleotide numbers are based on SV40-776. Shown are viral sequences
associated with transplanted human kidneys (clone designations are on the
right). Polymorphisms at the indicated residues are indicated above the
boxes
ref.
For a detailed description of the SV40 regulatory region
ref.
Regulatory region of SV40. DNA sequence profiles of regulatory regions
of SV40 isolates from monkeys and humans and of human tumor-associated
DNAs are shown. The diagrams are labeled as described in the legend to
Fig. 4. Shown are laboratory-adapted strains (SV40-776, Baylor, and VA45-54),
human isolates (SVCPC/SVMEN and SVPML-1), and viral sequences found associated
with human brain (CPT, CPP, CPC, and Ep) and bone (Ost) tumors. Tumor-associated
sequences usually contain a simple (archetypal) regulatory region without
duplications in the enhancer region
ref.
An appreciation of the replication cycle of SV40 is fundamental to
understanding the oncogenic capacity of SV40 and its potential etiologic
role in some human malignancies.
The MHC
class I molecules
are the specific cell surface receptors for SV40ref1,
ref2.
This initial step in the viral cycle helps
explain the broad tropism
of the virus and its ability to infect and induce transformation in many
types of cells and tissues. In addition, it provides an important distinction
between SV40 and the other 2 polyomaviruses that are able to infect humans,
JCV and BKV. JCV uses an N-linked glycoprotein and BKV uses a glycolipid
as unique host cell receptors. These marked differences are believed to
affect the nature of infections by these 3 viruses in tissues and individuals.
After infection of a cell, SV40 produces large and small T-ags early in
the viral replication cycle. These antigens bind and block important tumor
suppressor proteins, which include
p53
,
pRb
,
p107, and
p130/Rb2
ref1,
Lednicky, J. A, 153-164,
ref3.
The functions of these intracellular proteins are centered in the control
of the cell cycle. The tumor suppressor p53 is believed to sense DNA damage
and either pauses the cell in late G
1 for DNA repair or directs
the cell to commit suicide through the apoptotic pathway
ref1,
ref2.
Therefore, SV40 infections in humans may interfere with several pathways
related to cell cycle control and lead to development of malignancies.
Studies indicate that SV40 can replicate productively in human cells, including
fetal tissues
ref,
newborn kidney cells
ref,
and different human tumor cell lines
ref,
although it grows poorly in human fibroblasts
ref.
Moreover,
in vitro assays have shown that human cells can support
replication of SV40, establishing that human proteins have the intrinsic
ability to cooperate with SV40 T-ag to replicate SV40 DNA
ref1,
ref2,
ref3.
Some human cell types undergo visible cell lysis in response to SV40, whereas
others fail to exhibit cytopathic changes and produce low levels of virus
ref.
General conclusions from these early studies are that SV40 can replicate
in human cells and that various human cell types display differences in
susceptibility to infection by SV40. The basis for the differences is unknown,
but T-ag functions are believed to be important
ref1,
ref2.
Recent studies have shown that primary human mesothelial cells respond
to SV40 very differently from fibroblasts; the mesothelial cells are highly
susceptible to SV40 infection and transformation. Most mesothelial cells
were infected; few were killed; high levels of p53/T-ag complexes were
present;
Notch1
,
the
hepatocyte growth factor receptor (Met)
,
and
IGF-1
were upregulated; and the tumor suppressor gene RASSF1A was inhibited
ref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4.
SV40-positive human mesotheliomas show similar changes. The rate of transformation
of SV40-infected mesothelial cells was at least 1,000 times higher than
that of human fibroblasts
ref.
These findings emphasize that different human cell types may display dramatically
different virus-cell interactions during infection
Transmission
:
-
the recognized natural hosts for SV40 are species of Asian macaque monkeys,
especially the rhesus macaque (Macaca
mulatta
).
SV40, like the polyomaviruses JCV and BKV, establishes persistent infections,
often in the kidneys of susceptible hostsref1,
Lednicky, JA, 153-164. An association of primary polyomavirus infection
with mild respiratory tract disease
,
mild pyrexia, and transient cystitis
has been reportedref,
but the route of infection of these 3 viruses has not been firmly defined.
SV40 infections may become latent, and the level of virus present may be
very low. Both viremia and viruria occur in infected animals, and virus
shed in the urine is the probable means of transmissionref1,
ref2.
SV40 infections in healthy monkeys appear to be asymptomaticref,
but SV40 causes widespread infections among monkeys that are immunocompromised
due to SIV infectionref1,
ref2,
ref3;
SV40 sequences and infectious virus were detected in brain, kidney, spleen,
and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). These results demonstrate
that SV40 can be an opportunistic pathogen in immunosuppressed hosts and
that the virus may spread within the host by hematogenous routes. Zoonotic
transmission of SV40 should be a consideration in certain populations.
Indeed, laboratory workers in contact with SV40-infected monkeys and/or
tissues from those animals had a prevalence of antibodies to SV40 in the
range of 41 to 55%, suggesting an increased risk for viral infection among
this group of workersref1,
ref2.
25 of 109 of the North American zoo workers who had direct contact with
primates (23%) tested positive for SV40, as compared with 15 of 145 workers
(10%) who had no direct contact with primates. The mostly low-level of
SV40 exposure observed in the workers suggests that there is no ongoing
replication of SV40ref.
While humans who come into contact with primates may become infected with
SV40, there is currently no evidence to suggest that SV40 has spread outside
of zoo environments or that it plays a role in the development of cancer
in humans.
-
maternal-infant transmission is one possible route of SV40 spread in hamstersref.
This may represent a pathway for SV40 infections in humans (of unknown
frequency), as there are reports of the detection and expression of SV40
T-ag and the presence of viral DNA in cases of primary brain cancers in
infants and young childrenref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4,
ref5,
ref6
-
SV40 contamination of polio vaccines : the discovery of the polyomavirus
SV40, as well as its introduction as a pathogen into the human population,
was tied to the development and worldwide distribution of early forms of
the polio vaccine in the 1950'sref1,
ref2.
Inactivated
(Salk)
and early live
attenuated (Sabin)
forms of polio vaccines were inadvertently contaminated with SV40ref.
In addition, different adenovirus vaccines distributed to some U.S. military
personnel from 1961 to 1965 also contained SV40. The viral contamination
occurred because these early vaccines were prepared in primary cultures
of kidney cells derived from rhesus monkeys, which are often naturally
infected with SV40ref.
Infectious SV40 survived the vaccine inactivation treatments, and conservative
estimates indicate that up to 30 million people (children and adults) in
the United States may have been exposed to live SV40 from 1955 through
1963 when administered potentially contaminated polio vaccines. Millions
of people worldwide were also potentially exposed to SV40 because contaminated
polio vaccines were distributed and used in many countriesref.
These data led the Institute of Medicine to conclude that "the biological
evidence is of moderate strength that SV40 exposure from the polio vaccine
is related to SV40 infection in humans". Shortly after its discovery, SV40
was shown to be a potent oncogenic DNA virusref.
In animal models, the neoplasias induced by SV40 included primary brain
cancers, malignant mesotheliomas, bone tumors, and systemic lymphomasref.
Subsequently, many in vitro studies established that the oncogenic
capacity of SV40 reflects the disruption of critical cell cycle control
pathwaysref1,
ref2,
ref3.
During the last decade, numerous published studies from independent laboratories,
using different molecular biology techniques, have demonstrated SV40 large
tumor antigen (T-ag) or DNA in primary human brain and bone cancers and
malignant mesotheliomaref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4.
More recently, studies have demonstrated that SV40 T-ag sequences are significantly
associated with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL)ref1,
ref2,
ref3.
Therefore, the major types of tumors induced by SV40 in laboratory animals
are the same as those human malignancies found to contain SV40 markers.
A recent meta-analysisref
of the molecular evidence conclusively established a significant excess
risk of SV40 with those selected human cancers. It is noteworthy that SV40
has been detected in malignancies from children and young adults not exposed
to contaminated polio vaccines, as well as in older adultsref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4,
ref5,
ref6,
ref7,
ref8,
ref9,
ref10,
ref11.
The detection of viral markers in young persons, by using molecular techniques,
coupled with the isolation of infectious SV40 from tumorsref
and from nonneoplastic specimensref1,
ref2,
suggests that SV40 continues to cause infections in the human population
today. In contrast, some retrospective epidemiological studies have failed
to demonstrate an increased cancer risk in populations which had a high
likelihood of having received potentially contaminated polio vaccineref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4.
However, the epidemiological data available are recognized to be inconclusive
and limitedref,
and the Institute of Medicine found that the epidemiological data for cancer
rates in people potentially exposed to SV40-contaminated vaccines are inadequate
to evaluate a causal relationship. This conclusion is based on the lack
of data on which individuals actually received contaminated vaccines, the
unknown dosage of infectious SV40 present in particular lots of vaccine,
the failure to know who among the exposed were successfully infected with
SV40, the inability to know if the vaccine "unexposed" cohorts may have
been exposed to SV40 from other sources, and the difficulty of monitoring
a large population for cancer development for years after virus exposure.
These important limiting factors led the Institute of Medicine to "not
recommend additional epidemiological studies of people potentially exposed
to contaminated polio vaccine." Although the prevalence of SV40 infections
in humans is not known, studies conducted over the last 3 decades indicate
that SV40 infections are occurring in child and adult populations today.
These included individuals who received potentially SV40-contaminated vaccines,
as well as in persons born after 1963 who could not have been exposed to
those vaccinesref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4,
ref5,
ref6,
ref7,
ref8,
ref9,
ref10,
ref11,
ref12,
ref13,
ref14,
ref15,
ref16,
ref17,
ref18,
ref19,
ref20,
ref21,
ref22,
ref23,
ref24,
ref25,
ref26,
ref27,
ref28,
ref29,
ref30,
ref31,
ref32,
ref33,
ref34,
ref35,
ref36,
ref37,
ref38,
ref39,
ref40.
In addition, 19% of newborn children and 15% of infants 3 to 6 months old
at the time of receiving the oral contaminated polio vaccine were shown
to excrete infectious SV40 in their stools for up to 5 weeks after vaccinationref.
It is important to point out that the incidence of SV40 infections linked
to those vaccines is not known.
=>
progressive
multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML)
in AIDS patients. SV40 has been associated with a
PML
-like
disease in rhesus monkeys. For this reason, perhaps, there is still concern
that SV40 exposure by an atypical route may rarely result in late-developing
disease in humans.
=> SV40 is a potent DNA tumor virus, and mounting evidence suggests
that it is an emergent human pathogenref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4,
ref5,
ref6,
ref7,
ref8,
ref9.
Recently, the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies concluded
that "the biological evidence is strong that SV40 is a transforming virus"
and that "the biological evidence is of moderate strength that SV40 exposure
could lead to cancer in humans under natural conditions"ref.
In addition, 2 other independent scientific panels have made similar conclusionsref1,
ref2.
A recent analysis suggested that SV40 should be included in the list of
group 2A carcinogens (i.e., agents for which evidence is indicative but
not definitive for carcinogenesis in humans) by the International Agency
for Research on Cancerref.
The oncogenic capacity of SV40 infections has been well established
in laboratory animal modelsref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4.
The latent period of tumor development in hamsters infected with SV40 ranges
from 3 months to > 1 year. Following intravenous inoculation, about 33%
of the animals developed > 1 histologic type of neoplasm, with osteosarcomas
being most common after lymphomas. Following intracardiac inoculation,
malignant mesotheliomas and osteosarcomas developed in addition to lymphomasref.
The frequency of tumor development is usually > 90% in animals infected
as newborns but is reduced in older animals. These data suggest that the
age at the time of infection, the route of infection, and the duration
of infection may be factors influencing the development of malignancies
by SV40. An etiologic role of the virus in those cancers was supported
because SV40 T-ag was expressed in all malignant cells, animals with tumors
developed antibody against SV40 T-ag, and neutralization of SV40 with specific
antibody before virus inoculation prevented cancer developmentref1,
ref2.
Sequence analyses and detection of T-ag protein ruled out laboratory contamination
of tumor samples. Importantly, infectious SV40 was isolated from a primary
brain cancer of a 4-year-old childref.
An important consideration when evaluating the molecular biology data is
the sensitivity of methods used to detect SV40 in human tumor samples.
Early studies (before 1992) identified SV40-positive neoplasms by using
indirect immunofluorescence for viral proteins or DNA hybridization techniquesref1,
ref2,
ref3,
whereas studies after 1992 generally used PCR-based assays. During the
last 3 decades > 60 original studies have reported the detection of SV40
in primary brainref
and bone cancers, malignant mesotheliomaref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4,
and NHLref1,
ref2,
whereas a few studies have described an absence of SV40 in those malignancies.
However, the small numbers of samples tested, the histologic types of malignancies
examined, and the laboratory methodologies employed in some cases limit
the significance of the results in those studies reported to be negative.
Indeed, several steps need to be considered when performing molecular studies
of human specimensref1,
ref2,
ref3.
First, the extraction step of nucleic acids determines whether tissues
yield adequate and suitable DNA or RNA for analysis. Unfortunately,
with formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded specimens, degradation of nucleic
acids and proteins is a common problem, and the quality of recovered DNA
may be poor. If only small amounts of paraffin-embedded tissues are available,
the yield of nucleic acids may be inadequate for analysis. Primers
directed to a human cellular gene should be used to establish the suitability
of a sample for PCR analysis. Because of the sensitivity of PCR-based assays,
it is important to rigorously guard against laboratory contamination of
samples and controls during processing or testing. Tissue processing and
PCR assay setup should be performed in different facilities, from which
positive controls (i.e., plasmids) are excluded. Negative tissue controls,
extracted and analyzed in parallel, should be included in each experiment
to monitor for reagent contamination. The selection of primers and PCR
conditions greatly influences the sensitivity and reliability of the assay.
Another factor is that tumor specimens usually contain mixtures of normal
and malignant cells, in varying proportions. Variations in one or more
of these important parameters may explain, at least in part, the ranges
in positivity observed among some positive studies and the results obtained
in some negative studies. Although numerous studies have detected SV40
in human primary brain and bone cancers, malignant mesothelioma, and NHL,
the small sample sizes and the lack of a control group in some studies
made it difficult to make conclusions about the extent to which SV40 may
be associated with those human cancers. For this reason, we conducted a
meta-analysis of controlled studiesref,
an approach which can provide a more balanced and less biased estimate
of the evidence than individual studiesref.
For inclusion in the meta-analysis, reports had to meet the following criteria:
studies were conducted among patients with primary malignancies, the investigation
of SV40 was performed on primary cancer specimens and not on cultured cells,
the analysis included a control group, and the same laboratory technique
was used for both case and control samples. These criteria were established
because the use of appropriate controls is crucial in the proper analysis
of tissue for viral DNA, especially considering the sensitivity of PCR
techniquesref.
35 independent studies met these inclusion criteria. In total, data from
1,793 patients with primary malignancies were evaluated to determine whether
SV40 is significantly associated with primary brain cancer, malignant mesothelioma,
bone cancer, and NHL. The neoplasias induced by SV40 in animal models
includeref1,
ref2,
ref3
:
-
primary brain cancers : 13 human studies fulfilled the criteria
for the investigation of primary brain cancers. The combined odds ratio
(OR) of the studies used in the analysis was 3.9 (95% confidence interval
[CI], 2.6 to 5.8). This effect was based on specimens from a total of 1,143
patients, of which 661 were primary brain cancer samples and 482 were control
specimens. A modifier detected was the type of sample analyzed (paraffin
embedded versus frozen). The adjusted OR was 3.8 (95% CI, 2.6 to 5.7)ref.
-
malignant mesothelioma
(RASSF1A
demethylationref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4)
: 15 human studies fulfilled the criteria; the combined OR of analysis
was 16.8 (95% CI, 10.3 to 27.5) and was based on 528 patients with malignant
mesothelioma and 468 controls. Modifiers detected were the type of control
tissue and the method of detection of SV40. The adjusted OR was 15.1 (95%
CI, 9.2 to 25.0)ref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4.
Microdissection of human malignant mesothelioma samples followed by PCR
detected SV40 T-ag DNA only in cancer cells and not in adjacent nonmalignant
cellsref1,
ref2.
SV40-like DNA sequences are present in mesotheliomas as well as in bronchopulmonary
carcinomas and non-malignant pleuropulmonary diseasesref.
-
primary bone tumors : in human studies the combined OR of the analysis
was 24.5 (95% CI, 6.8 to 87.9) and was based on 303 patients with bone
tumors and 121 controls from 4 reportsref
-
systemic lymphomas : in hamsters inoculated intravenously with SV40, systemic
lymphomas developed among 72% of the animals, compared to none in the control
groupref1,
ref2,
ref3.
The lymphomas were of B-cell originref.
The OR for human non-Hodgkin's
lymphomas (NHL)
was 5.4 (95% CI, 3.1 to 9.3) and represented 301 cases and 578 controls
included in 3 studies. Because there were only 3 studies that fulfilled
the inclusion criteria, further examination of modifying variables was
not possible for NHLref1,
ref2,
ref3.
This analysis of published reports found a significant excess risk of SV40
associated with human primary brain cancers, malignant mesotheliomas, bone
cancers, and NHL compared to control samples. Therefore, the major types
of human malignancies associated with SV40 are the same as those induced
by SV40 in animal models. Although the proportion of human cancers containing
SV40 varied from study to study, viral prevalence was always greater among
primary tumors than among control tissues. Importantly, analysis of data
indicated that SV40 may be etiologically meaningful in the development
of a specific subset of human cancers. Multiple studies have shown the
expression of SV40 mRNA and/or T-ag in cancer cells, the integration of
SV40 sequences in some cancers, and SV40 T-ag protein complexed with p53
and pRb in some tumor specimens
ref1,
ref2,
ref3,
ref4,
ref5,
ref6.
These findings are compatible with current understanding of how SV40 T-ag
mediates oncogenesis. These results from different experimental studies
support the conclusion of the Institute of Medicine that "the biological
evidence is of moderate strength that SV40 exposure could lead to cancer
in humans under natural conditions." It has been reported that mesothelioma,
brain tumors, osteosarcoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) contain SV40
DNA sequences and that SV40 infection introduced into humans by the vaccine
probably contributed to the development of these cancers. The Immunization
Safety Review Committee of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) reviewed this
topic in 2002. The present review of recent studies showed that the earlier
results describing the recovery of SV40 DNA sequences from a large proportion
of the above tumors were not reproducible and that most studies were negative.
Contamination with laboratory plasmids was identified as a possible source
of false positive results in some previous studies. The low-level immunoreactivity
of human sera to SV40 was very likely the result of cross-reactivity with
antibodies to the SV40-related human polyomaviruses BKV and JCV, rather
than of authentic SV40 infection. SV40 sero-reactivity in patients with
the suspect tumors was no greater than that in controls. In epidemiologic
studies, the increased incidence of some of the suspect tumors in the 1970s
to 1980s was not related to the risk of exposure to SV40-contaminated vaccines.
In summary, the most recent evidence does not support the notion that SV40
contributed to the development of human cancers
ref