The virus isolated from an infected animal is named
street
virus : it has a very long incubation period and replicates also in
extranervous tissues. After multiple passages on rabbit brain ("
fixation")
it becomes a
fixed virus / virus fixé (remain fixed during
further transmission; used for inoculating animals from which rabies vaccine
is prepared), with a 4-7 days incubation period and replicating only in
nervous tissues.
Table of contents :
Epidemiology :
mortality worldwide is estimated to be 40,000-70,000 people annually, half
of which are in childrenref
-
Canada : during 1999-2003, 127 cases of raccoon variant rabies were reported
in raccoons (Procyon lotor) and striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis)
in Ontario, Canada. Raccoons accounted for 98% (125/127) of the reported
cases with behaviors/conditions including aggression, fighting with dogs,
ataxia, vocalizations, appearance of being sick, and the presence of porcupine
(Erethizon dorsatum) quills. Of the rabid raccoons, 78% of were
adults. Juveniles were underrepresented (22%) compared with the adult/juvenile
ratios found in non-rabid Ontario raccoon populations. Of the age-known
raccoons, 83% were ¾ 3 years of age, and 22% of the rabid adult
female raccoons had evidence of having had a litter during the year in
which they were found to be rabid. The majority of rabid raccoons were
reported during the fall, winter, and spring, suggesting a relationship
between raccoon behavioral activities such as denning and breeding and
the timing of rabies outbreaks. Multiple cases of raccoon rabies occurred
at several barns, suggesting that those structures serve as focal points
of rabies transmission as a result of denning activities. Movements of
5 rabid raccoons (range 1564-4143 m) were not different from movements
of non-rabid raccoons in Ontario. Government staff submitted 66 percent
of the rabid animals, stressing the importance of those agencies in rabies
control and surveillance operations. Increased knowledge of the behaviors
of rabid raccoons should assist in the development of management strategies
for rabiesref.
During 15 Jul to 4 Oct 1999, rabies control programs were implemented with
the objective being to contain the 1st 3 confirmed cases of raccoon rabies
in Canada. The strategy, called point infection control (PIC), involved
the use of 3 tactics: population reduction (PR), trap-vaccinate-release
(TVR), and oral rabies vaccination with baits (ORV), to control the spread
of raccoon rabies. A total of 1202 raccoons (Procyon lotor) and
337 skunks (Mephitis mephitis) were captured and euthanized using
24 719 trap-nights in the 3 PR zones around the location of the 3 rabies
cases, near Brockville, Ontario. That represented an 83% to 91% reduction
in the raccoon populations in an approximate 225 sq. km. area around the
3 rabies cases. Raccoon density in the PR zones declined from 5.1-7.1 sq.
km. to 0.6-1.1 sq. km. following control. All tested specimens were negative
for rabies by the fluorescent antibody test (FAT). In addition, 1759 raccoons
and 377 skunks were intramuscularly vaccinated against rabies and released
using 27 956 trap-nights in an approximate 485 sq. km. TVR zone implemented
outside of the PR zones. A total of 856 cats from both PR and TVR areas
were also captured, vaccinated, and released. Cost for the 3 PIC operations
was CanD 363 000 (USD 315 625) or about CanD 500 (USD 435) per sq. km.
To further contain the outbreak, about 81 300 baits containing Raboral
V-RG oral rabies vaccine were aerially distributed on 8 and 27 Sep 1999,
to create an 8 to 15 km.-wide buffer zone (an area of 1200 sq. km) of vaccinated
raccoons immediately beyond the PR and TVR zones. This was the 1st time
that V-RG was used in Canada to orally vaccinate free ranging raccoons
against rabies. Baiting costs were CanD 241 000 (USD 209 550) or about
CanD 200 (USD 174) per sq. km. including post baiting assessment costs.
As of 31 Aug 2000, 35 additional cases (38 in total) of raccoon rabies
have occurred in the control and vaccination zones. This number is far
below the level of rabies prevalence in USA jurisdictions where raccoon
rabies was epizootic. In the future, PIC methodologies will continue to
be used in Ontario to contain isolated cases of raccoon rabiesref
-
USA : of the 47 cases of human rabies reported in the USA since 1990, 4
occurred in organ transplant recipients and were associated with an undetected
case of rabies in a single organ donorref;
the remainder apparently were acquired from contact with animals with rabies
virus infections. 38 (81%) of the infections were acquired in the USA.
Among the 9 infections acquired elsewhere, 2 were acquired in Haiti (1994
and 2004), 2 in Mexico (1993 and 1994), and 1 each in India (1992), Southeast
Asia (1996), Ghana (2000), the Philippines (2001), and El Salvador (2004).
The greatest risk for naturally acquired rabies in the USA is from encounters
with and bites from insectivorous batsref.
In particular, a rabies-virus variant associated with 2 small-bodied bats,
the eastern pipistrelle bat (Pipistrellus subflavus) and silver-haired
bat (Lasionycteris noctivagans) was identified in 20 (69%) of 29
persons with samples testedref.
The continued availability of rabies vaccine currently relies upon only
one licensed manufacturer in the USA; a 2nd manufacturer suspended and
has not resumed production after a voluntary recall of its rabies vaccine
in March 2004 (CDC. Manufacturer's recall of human rabies vaccine--April
2, 2004. MMWR 2004;53:287-9). In the USA, mandatory vaccination and stray-dog
control programs have virtually eliminated circulation of any canine rabies
virus variant among dogsref.
In comparison, occurrence of rabies in dogs remains a problem in Haiti
and other developing countriesref.
The patient bitten in Haiti in 2004 by a dog in Haiti 8 months before clinical
signs of rabies became evident. This was the longest incubation period
among 12 U.S. rabies cases with exposure history reported since 1997 (median:
39 days; range: 21 to 240 days); however, longer incubation periods of
11 months to 6 years were suggested by findings in 3 cases previously describedref.
Although human rabies is rare in the USA, it should be considered in the
postmortem differential diagnosis of fatal viral encephalitis cases with
short morbidity periods if no cause of disease has been established. Hospitalized
patients with encephalitis of unknown etiology should be on contact precautions,
and rabies should be part of antemortem differential diagnosis in these
patients. Both antemortem and postmortem testing for rabies are available
at CDC and can be arranged through state health departments. Retrospective
detection of 4 transplant-associated rabies casesref
and retrospective identification of an additional case in California in
an immigrant from El Salvador, brought the total number of 2004 cases in
the USA to 8, the highest number of human rabies cases reported since 1956,
when 10 cases were reported.
-
Europe :
-
Austria reported one single rabies case -- in an equine -- during 2003;
oral vaccination in wildlife is applied
-
Germany : on April 2005 tropus moved in 4 German states and neighbouring
parts of France, trying to vaccinate enough foxes to stop the disease spreading,
as national and regional authorities trade accusations. The reason for
the flare-up appears to be patchy vaccination of wild foxes in the German
state of Hesse. Officials at Germany's national rabies laboratory in Wusterhausen
say they will stamp out this nest of infection this year, by vaccinating
foxes every 6 weeks if they have to. But their counterparts in France,
Switzerland and Belgium are expressing "serious concern" that unless recommendations
about fox vaccination made by a panel of European Union scientists in 2002
are strictly applied, large areas of Europe where rabies had been eradicated
could be reinfected. Rabies eradication was one of Europe's success stories.
Switzerland became rabies-free in 1998, thanks to a huge campaign in which
biscuits doped with vaccine were distributed in fox habitats. France was
next to eliminate the disease, in 2000, followed by Belgium and Luxembourg
in 2001. In 2000, this helped convince the rabies-free UK to end compulsory
quarantine for mammals brought in from some European countries. But in
Germany, stubborn nests of infection persisted. Part of the problem was
ensuring even vaccination in urban areas, where placing baits can be difficult,
says Thomas Muller, head of the Wusterhausen lab. Another big problem was
human error. States managed their vaccination campaigns themselves, with
varying effectiveness. Muller's team is trying to get better cooperation.
Several former problem states, including Bavaria, have not found any cases
for several years. But there has been no let-up in Hesse, which found 24
rabid foxes in 2004. In December, one turned up in Baden-Wurttemberg, which
had been rabies-free since 1996 and stopped vaccinating in 2002. And in
January 2005, Rhineland-Palatinate, rabies-free since 1998, found rabid
foxes near the Hesse border. Late in 2004 all 3 states plus Bavaria carried
out emergency vaccination in threatened areas, and this week they are air-dropping
vaccine-laced bait across thousands of square kilometres. France stopped
vaccinating in 2003, but Florence Cliquet, head of the French national
rabies lab in Nancy, says her team will bait fox dens along the German
border this week, and will vaccinate a 60-kilometre-wide border strip in
May 2005. The virus could really spread fast if it got loose now. The persistence
of rabies in Germany is blamed on the ineffectiveness of the German vaccine,
and points to figures suggesting that it takes twice as many German as
French baits to clear an area of rabies. The virus in German vaccine sometimes
reverts to the disease-causing form. This is known to have happened once
in Austria, but there have been only 3 suspected cases in Germany
in the past 5 years. He insists the main problem is the way the vaccination
campaigns have been run. The EU must hope he is right. New member states
such as Poland still have rabies problems, and most vaccination campaigns
rely on the German vaccine. Despite the progress observed and the
absence of substantive adverse environmental or health effects, oral vaccination
is not a panacea, and should be viewed as an important adjunct to traditional
prevention and control techniques in human and veterinary medicine. Local
outbreak suppression of rabies among free-ranging wildlife is documented,
and regional elimination of particular virus variants among specific, targeted
carnivore hosts is demonstrable, but true disease eradication is not achievable
at the present time by current techniques. Oral vaccination of wildlife
against rabies has been one of the most remarkable achievements in wildlife
disease management. As a result of this novel approach, large areas of
Europe and North America have been freed of terrestrial rabies. The fox
population has indeed increased in certain areas of Europe (up to 8-fold),
but it has also decreased in other areas. Significant increase in fox densities,
even when restricted to limited areas, might be of epidemiological significance.
Several commercial oral rabies vaccines for wildlife are available which
use the following rabies virus strains; SAD Berne, SAD B19, SAD P5/88,
Vnukovo, ERA, SAD VA1, SAG1, and SAG2. The latter 3 are so-called "escape
mutants" with 1 (SAG1, SAD VA1) or 2 (SAG2) substitutions
at site 333 of the viral glycoprotein. All these attenuated rabies vaccine
viruses are direct or indirect derivates from the original Street Alabama
Dufferin (SAD)-strain that was isolated from a rabid dog in Alabama
in 1935. Furthermore, a recombinant vaccinia virus expressing the rabies
glycoprotein (V-RG) is also available as an oral rabies vaccine. In other
words, all commercial available oral rabies vaccines are live virus vaccines
and can therefore revert to virulence under field conditions, as has been
documented for the SAD Berne and ERA-strain (Wandeler AI (1988) Control
of Wildlife rabies. In: Campbell JB, Charlton KM (eds.) Rabies. Boston;
Kluwer Academic Publishers, pg. 365-380; Wanddeler AI (1994) ERA induced
rabies in Ontario wildlife. In: 5th Annual International Meeting Rabies
in the Americas, Ontario, Canada, pg. 43-44). There are documented differences
in the residual pathogenicity and immunogenicity between the different
SAD-strains. Although the recombinant V-RG cannot induce rabies, other
safety issues are involved with this vaccine, as has been demonstrated
in the only known serious human incidence associated with an oral rabies
vaccineref.
The information about reversion to virulence of the German vaccine as mentioned
in the New Scientist article is misleading and actually incorrect. A short
description of this case can be found in the Rabies Bulletin Europeref.
On 31 May 2004, a young fox showing apathy and wasting was shot near the
village of Gallizien in the district of Volkermarkt, Carinthia. ---
The animal was handed in for routine rabies diagnosis at the Institute
for Veterinary Disease Control in Moedling, Austria. Initially the fluorescent
antibody test (FAT) of the brain sample showed a positive result. Therefore
additional diagnostic tests were carried out. Rabies tissue culture
infection test (RTCIT) was performed on mouse neuroblastoma cells according
to the OIE Manual of Standards for Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines with positive
result. Also the mouse inoculation test (MIT) confirmed this finding.
--- While a young fox (approximately 3 months old) was involved,
it was deemed highly unlikely that this animal had reached Gallizien from
a rabies-infected area on its own, especially because the nearest rabies
foci is over 75 km away (Croatia). The fox brain sample together with the
oral vaccine strain used during the vaccination campaign in 2003/2004 were
also analysed by means of RT-PCR of the rabies virus nucleoprotein gene
yielding positive results. Subsequent sequencing of the 900 bp long PCR
products showed that the virus strain from the rabid fox was related very
closely to the oral vaccine strain. For confirmation complementary studies
were initiated in close collaboration with the WHO Collaborating Centres
in Weybridge, Great Britain and Wusterhausen, Germany. The present case
showed that infection of a young fox with a live rabies vaccine-like virus
is possible. Nevertheless, in the light of the intensive vaccination in
this area during the last years the present case may be considered as a
rare event". The said description does not refer to the relationship between
the causative rabies virus and SAD P5/88. Final results of the complementary
studies in the rabies reference labs in Weybridge and Wusterhausen will
be helpfulref.
Other attenuated rabies vaccines besides the Vaccinia/antigen vector vaccine
are still being used. First of all, there is no such thing as "the" German
vaccine; there are actually 3 licensed German vaccines (SAD B19, SAD P5/88
and SAD VA1) from 2 different manufacturers. Although the Austrian case
is still under investigation, it was shown by different laboratories that
the virus strain isolated from the brain of the fox was a SAD-related virus
(as all live-modified oral rabies vaccines) but not identical with the
oral rabies vaccine virus distributed in the area (SAD P5/88). The 3 suspected
cases in Germany are nothing more than that; suspected cases. The standard
rabies diagnostic techniques to identify differentiate field virus from
vaccine virus (monoclonal antibodies vs. PCR) have given contradictory
results, and hopefully these cases will be clarified in the near future.
The claim by Michel Aubert that the German vaccine is ineffective is incorrect,
considering that this vaccine virus (SAD B19) still is the most widely
used oral rabies vaccine in the world in terms of number of countries and
baits used (> 100 million vaccine baits since 1983). Several whole countries
and huge areas in other countries that have used this vaccine virus exclusively
have already been free of terrestrial rabies for many years (e.g. Finland,
the Netherlands, Italy, eastern part of Germany). Other countries will
hopefully achieve this goal in the near future (e.g. Austria, limited area
in western part of Germany, Poland). The vaccine virus used is just one
of the many parameters influencing the success of oral vaccination. The
actual rabies situation, density of settlements, and the fox population,
together with the selected baiting strategy, are some of the other major
factors determining the outcome of the vaccination campaigns.
-
Serbia-Montenegro : large numbers of wildlife cases each year (67 to 186
per year from 1996 to 2004; 15 rabid foxes in Belgrade in 2005). An oral
vaccination program for foxes was due to be initiated in 2005. The last
reported case of human rabies in Serbia was in 1972 in Kosovo and Metohijaref.
-
Asia accounts for > 90% of all rabies fatalities
-
China : from 1984 to 1989, the annual reported cases were between 4000
and 6000 but decreased after 1990 (3520 cases).
-
1995 - 400
-
1996 - 159
-
1997 - 230
-
1998 - 234
-
1999 - 373
-
2000 - 505
-
2001 - 899
-
2002 - 1532
-
2003 - 2009
-
2004 - not available, but according to the above newswire this was 2651
The epidemic areas were mainly located in the southeast and southwest parts
of the country, such as Sichuan, Hunan, Guangxi, Guangdong, Anhui, Fujian,
etc, where dogs were raised for meat and there was no requirement for such
dogs to be vaccinated. In contrast, Beijing was considered to be rabies-free
as a consequence of a policy of compulsory vaccination of pet dogs, which
was rigidly enforced in urban areas. It seems that Beijing may have lost
its rabies-free status, possibly due to population movements. Visitors
to China should be made aware of this situation. Furthermore, there was
not the significant seasonal distribution it showed before. Numbers of
human rabies cases are continuing to rise over the last 5 years in China,
with an increase of 44.65%, 1.74%, and 45.93% in 1997, 1998, 1999. Human
rabies incidence was also seen an increase from 0.0134 per 100,000 in 1996
to 0.02708 per 100,000 in 1999. The provinces showing increases in rabies
were mainly located in south China : among them, Jiangsu province reported
40 human cases in 1999, which increased 207.69% over the corresponding
period in 1998. The cases in these high epidemic provinces accounted for
75% of the whole nation's cases. The number of reported rabies case is
also rising. In 2003 : > 1000 cases
-
important factors responsible for the recurrence of rabies
-
increasing numbers of dogs being bred
-
low inoculation rate of dogs
-
poor control on the quality of (animal ?) rabies vaccine
-
mistreatment of wounds (failure to administer antirabies serum timely
or for
the full course after exposure)
-
lack of cooperation between different official departments regarding rabies
control
China has about 150 million pet dogs. The number has climbed 30% in the
past 5 years, Euromonitor Plc said in a 2005 report. The market research
company attributes the increase to the desire among one-child households
for an extra companion and as a source of comfort for older people. The
rabies-free status of Beijing in recent years can probably be attributed
to the compulsory vaccination of pet dogs, which seems to be rigidly enforced
in urban areas. In contrast, there is no requirement for dogs raised and
sold for meat to be vaccinated. The majority of dogs which have been killed
as a result of rabies outbreaks have been in dog meat production areas,
where there are few if any pet dogs. The elevation of the dog from culinary
item to household companion in Chinese society is being accompanied by
an unexpected increase in the burden of cases of human rabies. Previous
reports from China have described the containment of canine rabies in the
capital by the licensing and compulsory vaccination of domestic pets. A
similar policy will need to be implemented in rural areas throughout the
country and in the booming southern province of Guangdong to reduce both
the number of cases of human rabies and the very high number of people
seeking protection by vaccination. Guangdong province reported 306 deaths
in 2005ref.
On 7-13 Aug 2006, 16 human deaths from rabies were recorded in the province
of Shandong : in response to this situation, the provincial authorities
carried out the destruction of > 500,000 dogs, an event that attracted
unfavorable global media attention. Recently in Yunan province, 3 people
died as a result of rabies contracted by dog bites : similarly, in this
province, the local authorities responded with the violent destruction
of approximately 50 000 dogs. According to statistics issued from non-governmental
organizations, in Beijing alone, there are around 100,000 stray dogs and
500,000 feral cats : officials cannot guarantee how many of them have all
been properly vaccinated, so Beijing is under a threat of a potential rabies
epidemic. According to statistics compiled from the beginning of 2006,
> 60,000 people have been bitten by cats or dogs in Beijing, an increase
of 40% in comparison to the tally for 2005 : among them, 16 000 are classified
as seriousref1,
ref2.
2660 people died from rabies in 2004, while in 1996 there were only 159
reported fatalities. Rabies was the second most common deadly infectious
disease after tuberculosis in 2005, accounting for 19% of the total deaths.
China has some 150 million pet dogs, according to estimates. The number
of vaccinations in Beijing rose from 8000 in January to 15 000 in June,
with a total of 69 332 in the first half of 2006. During the first 8 months
of 2006 there were 1874 rabies cases, including 1735 deaths, up 29% over
the same period of 2005ref.
From January to September 2006 there were 2254 confirmed cases of rabies,
up by 29.7% compared with the same period in 2005ref.
The concerns of the Chinese authorities in relation to dog-transmitted
rabies are in place, both from local public health considerations as well
as in view of the expected influx of visitors during the 2008 Olympics,
whose confidence in a safe stay should be guaranteed. Over-sized dogs and
dogs without photo identification in Beijing are being snatched by the
city police to curb the spread of rabies, which has killed about 200 people
a month in China this year. Human rabies fatalities nationwide surged 30%
to 1817 in the first 9 months of 2006. At least 10 deaths occurred in the
capital, the official Xinhua news agency said this month, as attacks by
abandoned, rabid dogs escalate. Police are killing strays before they can
bite people, and ordering owners to register their pets. Beginning 1 Nov
2006, owners without a credit card-sized license bearing their pet's photo
will face fines of up to 5000 yuan (USD 635) and the confiscation of the
animal. Beijing authorities also introduced a one-dog per owner policy
and is enforcing a decade-old ban on violent and large dogs, such as German
shepherds. There has been a significant rise in the number of human cases
of rabies particularly over the last 3 years in China : this is something
that requires action. Police are stepping up enforcement as the rate of
infection rises and
China is spending USD 34 billion in preparation for the 2008 Olympics
in Beijing. More than 8900 unregistered dogs were nabbed in the city in
2006. Dog-bite injuries in Beijing are increasing by about 10 000 a year,
and reached 70 000 in the first half. The trend is similar in other cities.
Asia accounts for > 80% of rabies cases worldwide, according to a study
by researchers in China and the U.K. published in December in Emerging
Infectious Diseases journal. In China, 103 200 people died of rabies in
4 epidemic waves between 1950 and 2004. Human cases are now approaching
levels not seen since the 1980s. A fifth epidemic wave of rabies that began
in the 1990s is gaining momentum. Abandoned dogs bear much the blame. In
China it is extortionately expensive to register an animal. Pets are often
kept illegally and unvaccinated : vaccination should be compulsory and
cheap. Initial registration costs 1000 yuan (USD 127) and includes the
1st rabies vaccination. The fee, including a booster shot, declines to
500 yuan in subsequent years. In New York, by contrast, the annual registration
costs USD 2.50 for a dog that has been neutered or spayed, and USD 10.50
for others. A
rabies shot goes for about USD 10ref.
At present, the latest Chinese dog-rabies (incomplete) figures on WHO's
Rabnet date back to 1996ref.
-
India : a fatal case of imported human rabies has been reported in England
in 2005. The patient was bitten by a dog while on holiday in Goa, India.
The diagnosis of rabies was confirmed by the United Kingdom National Reference
Laboratory for Rabies in Weybridge, Surreyref.
In February 2005, a German woman died of rabies after spending four weeks
in India in late 2004ref,
and in May 2004, a man in Bavaria, Germany died from a rabies infection
that he acquired during his 5-month stay in Indiaref.
India reports at least 30 000 human deaths from rabies per year, i.e. an
annual incidence of approximately 3 deaths per 100 000 populationref
-
Russia : 14 inhabitants of Russia died from rabies in 2005. Rabies incidence
in animals continues to be high in Russia. The main spreaders of infection
are wild animals: foxes, raccoon dogs, wolves, and badgers. In Udmurtiya
alone, the number of rabies cases in animals increased by 40 percent compared
to 2005. The reason for this increase is related to deficient control of
vectors -- mainly foxes. The Omsk area has always been known as a heavily
infected area; currently there are views ascribing the deterioration to
the migration of predators from Kazakhstan and to the significant increase
in the vector population.
-
Belarus : the frequency of requests for post-exposure rabies treatment
remained rather high but stable (around 200-250 per million population
since the 1990s). On average, > 70% of people needing post-exposure rabies
treatment had been bitten by dogs, approximately 14% by cats, > 2% by farm
animals and 4.5% by wild animals. For vaccinating humans, cell-culture
inactivated rabies vaccine is used routinely. Between 1951 and 2003, 135
people were reported to have died from rabies. There were no cases of rabies
in humans registered in 2004 and 2005. In 2006, however, 2 people died
of this illness: a 43-year-old woman bitten by a cat and a young man bitten
by a raccoon dog. Neither of them sought medical help before the onset
of symptoms (the epidemiological data published monthly on the website
of the Belarusian centre of hygiene, epidemiology and public health only
includes rabies cases in animals. The situation in humans is described
in the official bulletin: "Rabies in the Republic of Belarus." The most
recent edition, however, covers the 1st half of 2006 and therefore does
not contain information about the human cases, both of which occurred in
Julyref.
At present, the epizootic and epidemiologic situation in Belarus is of
concern. Due to changes in lifestyle (tourism, summer houses), the number
of people, including inhabitants of big cities and tourists, who are in
contact with potentially rabid wild or domestic animals is growing. An
additional challenge is posed by the neighboring countries; the highest
numbers of rabies cases in animals have been
in the northwestern region of Belarus, bordering Latvia and Lithuania.
In 2003, in Belarus, about 5 cases of rabies were registered per 1000 sq/km,
while in Latvia and Lithuania, the corresponding figures were 15 and 17
respectively. In 2004, all 3 countries observed a decrease in the number
of reported cases, but this downward trend continued in 2005 and 2006 only
in Latvia. In Belarus and Lithuania, the numbers of rabies cases in animals
rose again during this time.
-
Uzbekistan : 1996 - 56 cases; 1997 - 27; 1998 - 3; 1999 - 3; 2002 - 3;
2004 - 5
-
South America : annual incidences of 0.01-0.2 deaths per 100 000 are reported
from Latin America.
-
Brazil : between 1986 and 2004, the Ministry of Health was notified of
743 human rabies cases in Brazil, most of which occurred in the north and
northeast of the country. Numbers of cases had been falling steadily from
1980 (over 170 cases) to 2003 (under 20 cases), mainly due to control of
rabies in dog populations. Up to 2003, most human rabies infections notified
in Brazil were transmitted in an urban setting by cats or dogs, but most
infections since 2004 have been transmitted by bats in rural parts of the
states of Para and Maranhao. From May 2003 to May 2004 600 people were
attacked by the thumb-sized vampire bats in municipality of Portel, next
to the world's biggest estuarine archipelago of Marajo Island, state of
Para, Brazil. During the course of March 2004, there were 17 human cases
(13 confirmed and 4 suspected), including 15 deaths (13 confirmed and 2
suspected, almost all in the north (Amazonian Region) and northeast. On
May 20 : 22 deaths (10 laboratory confirmed and 16 clinically and epidemiologically
compatible). The bat attacks occurred mainly during the months of September
and October 2003. In the meantime, these episodes have been frequent in
the rural area of the Acuti Pereira River, where the affected persons reside.
Initial evaluations indicate the existence of more than one colony of bats
in the affected localities. In October 2005 12 rabies deaths were reported
in Turiacu, in the state of Maranhao. Rabies deaths have also been reported
in 2005 in Godofredo Viana (3), Candido Mendes (2) and Carutapera (2),
and the local media reports that several hundred may have been bitten by
bats. These areas are in the north of Maranhao, next to the focus of a
bat-transmitted human rabies outbreak in the state of Para in 2004. Rabies
transmitted by dogs is rare in other areas of the country, whereas rabies
associated with vampire bat attacks on humans is not infrequent in the
Amazonian region of Brazil and Peru. Outbreaks of bat-related rabies have
been linked to the continued deforestation of the Amazon region, which
has displaced vampire bats across northern Brazil and increased contact
with humans. The Ministry of Health also notes that abandoned gold mines
in Maranhao have provided favourable habitats for bat populationsref
-
Venezuela : vampire bat attacks on humans in been documentedref.
About 1130 people in Viseu and 140 inhabitants of Fermiana e Curupati,
2 1/2 hours from Viseu township [Para state, some 280 miles (450 km) to
the east of Portel] had been bitten by the thumb-sized bats from May 2003
to May 2004. None of them had been to the health post to get antirabies
serum or vaccine. So far, one death due to rabies has been recorded, along
with 4 suspect deaths and 16 people admitted to hospital with symptoms.
But now all the inhabitants of the 2 localities are being vaccinated, with
a series of 5 doses. Dogs and cats are also being vaccinated there. > 130
bats have been captured and 5% of those will be tested for rabies. 1 patient
arrived at the hospital on 13 May 2004 with paralyzed legs and is now in
a coma and on a ventilator. 7 other patients ranging in age from 11 to
49 years are in stable condition and will be discharged in the next few
hours. Only one of them had been bitten by a bat; agricultural pesticide
poisoning was suspected to be the cause of the symptoms. They could not
have had rabies, because nobody recovers after symptoms appear. Genetic
characterization and antigenic analyses of isolates from human cases of
rabies in Venezuelaref
have revealed considerable diversity and identified several antigenic variants
-
Africa : 0.001-13 deaths per 100 000 are reported, but rabies is grossly
under-reported in many countries.
-
Morocco : officially reported rabies cases were: 2002: 23 humans, 192 dogs,
25 cats; 2003: 17 humans, 173 dogs, 14 cats. Obviously, the actual incidence
in animals was much higher. In addition, there were numerous cases in domestic
farm animals etc.
In a 1995 PAHO document vampire bat rabies (
derriengue) is identified
as an important public health and economic concern in Latin America, French
Guinea, Guyana, Suriname and Trinidad and Tobago
ref.
From 1989 to 1995, 73 human deaths were attributed to rabies transmitted
by vampire bats. It is likely that both vampire and insectivorous bats
play a role in the maintenance of rabies infection in Venezuela and in
other Latin American countries. The increased number of human attacks may
be linked to a change in the bats' migration pattern due to deforestation
: such attacks usually occur when bats are deprived of their usual source
of food, such as domestic pigs and cattle. Elsewhere (Australia, Chile,
Europe, and North America), insectivorous bats are usually associated with
transmission of rabies virus to humans. Vampire bats pose a significant
problem also in the remote Mosquitia area of Honduras and Nicaragua, especially
in the middle and upper ranges of the Coco River. Children represent 60-70%
of the cases; most common sites affected were the great toe, the foot,
the scalp and the tip of the nose. This empirical observation seems to
contradict some studies that have shown increased vampire bite prevalence
in adult (mostly male) humans. The discrepancy could be due to a number
of reasons, including the demographics of the population studied (some
of these surveys have done in mining areas of the Brazilian and Venezuelan
Amazon region, where the population at risk would be expected to be predominantly
adult and male); the food-seeking behavior pattern of the animals, which
locate and recognize their hosts by detection of radiating body heat by
means of special receptors in their noseleaf, as well as by the sense of
smell and by echolocation: perhaps young children, having higher metabolic
rates than adults, present an easier-to-find source for a bloodmeal. Children
also have a thinner corneal layer in their epidermis and more superficial
and larger number of capillary vessels in their skin, all of which would
make the bite more "productive" from the bat's perspective. Lastly, there
could be differences in bloodmeal-seeking behavior between northern (e.g.
Central American) and southern (South American) bats, even belonging to
the same species (probably the common vampire,
Desmodus rotundus).
Finally, it is important to remember that most people (adults or children)
do not realize they have been bitten until they wake up then next morning,
usually with a moderate amount of blood surrounding the lesion, due to
the anticoagulant effect of the bat's saliva. Vampire bats bites are typically
painless, and one wonders if, in addition to the known anticoagulants,
the animal's saliva also contains some compound which acts as a form of
topical anesthetic
ref1,
ref2,
ref3
Proteomics :
-
nucleocapsid (NC) protein acts as a SAg
for human Vb8- and murine Vb6-containing
TcRs, triggering Th2
polarization.
-
rabies virus G glycoprotein (RVG) is a trimeric ligand for the N-terminal
Cys-rich domain of TNFRSF16 / p75NTR

Transmission :
-
bites of infected (rabid) vertebratesref1,
ref2
:
-
urban rabies : Carnivora
(Canis familiaris
(canine rabies is prevalent in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Worldwide
estimates of human rabies deaths exceed 50,000 cases each year, and >95%
of reported cases occur in regions where canine rabies is endemic. Dogs
account for 99% of human cases worldwide, and for 95% of post-exposure
vaccinations), Felis
catus
(stray cats)), Microchiroptera
(chiropterans (frugivorous, hematophagous and insectivorous bats); most
human cases in the USA : in several South American countries, vampire bat
rabies is a problem for both livestock and the human population. There
are 3 species of vampire bats, the most important disease-transmitter being
Desmodus
rotundus
.
Protection of livestock has depended on the use of bovine vaccines and/or
use of anticoagulants, such as diphenadione or warfarin, which can be administered
to bovines as slow-release boluses, or mixed with grease and applied to
the skin. Vampire bats suffer fatal hemorrhages in their wing capillaries
as a result of ingesting bovine blood containing anticoagulant, or during
grooming to remove adherent grease. Humans can be protected by vaccination
with standard human rabies vaccine, or less effectively by protective netting
at night. The vulnerability of children may be a consequence of greater
depth of sleep and reduced awareness of attack by vampire bats), Rodentia
(including squirrels, Mus
musculus
,
Rattus
spp.
),
Martes
foina
,
or Meles meles
).
There is vaccine approved for horses and for cattle. In areas where rabies
is known to be a concern, vaccinating horses and cattle is a cheap insurance
policy against the devastating effects of this disease. In the United States
there are no documented cases of rats causing rabies in human beings. However,
there are documented cases of rats causing rabies in human beings in other
countries. Poland has recorded cases, as described by Zmudzinski and Smreczak
1995, and by Wincewicz 2002. Likewise, Israel has had rabies transmitted
by rats (Gdalevich et al 2000), as have Thailand
(Kamoltham et al 2002) and Surinam (Verlinde et al 1975). According
to Winkler 1973, there have been few infected rats in the US. When Winkler
reviewed the literature covering an 18 year period between 1953 and 1970,
only a small number of rabid rats (39 rats) were reported. During the 3
year period of 1953-1955, only 11 rabid rats were reported to be found
with rabies in the US. A decline seemed to be occurring, as during the
3 year period of 1968-1970 there were only 2 reports of rabid rats. Winkler
does speculate on the reason for the decline, but this moderator finds
no merit in his speculation. Smith et al (1968) indicated that in Thailand
9 Norway rats out of 192 or 4.7% were found to be carrying rabies. One
reason for the rarity of rabies in rats is the simple fact that rodents
rarely survive the attacks of carnivores (rabid or otherwise) and are unlikely
to recover, develop the disease and then bite humans.
-
sylvan rabies : Vulpes
spp.
,
Meles
meles
,
weasels, Mustela
putorius furo
,
marmots and Mustela
eversmannii
.
Properly cooked vertebrate meat do not constitute a source of rabies infection.
During the period 1980 to 2000, a total of 26 (74%) of rabies virus
variants obtained from patients in the USA was associated with insectivorous
bats (24 (74%) of the 32 cases since 1990), most commonly silver-haired
and eastern pipistrelle batsref1,
ref2,
including a variant from a fatal case of rabies reported in Wisconsin in
2000ref,
although a history of a bite was established in only 2 cases. In this case,
only 5 health-care workers received PEP. Contact with bats occurred in
approximately half of the other cases. These cases represent various bat-contact
histories: a bat bite, direct contact with bats with multiple opportunities
to be bitten, and possible direct contact with a bat. Although rabies is
usually transmitted by a bite, persons may minimize the medical implications
of a bat bite. Unlike bites from larger animals, the trauma of a bat bite
is unlikely to warrant seeking medical care. Unless the potential for rabies
exposure is known to the patient, rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP)
will not be received. Although bat rabies virus variants can be transmitted
secondarily from terrestrial mammals, the lack of other animal-bite histories
and the rarity of bat rabies virus variants found in terrestrial mammals
suggest that this means of transmission is rare. Persons who are bitten
or scratched by any animal should wash wounds thoroughly and seek immediate
medical attention to evaluate the need for PEP. In all cases where bat-human
contact has occurred or is suspected, the bat should be collected and tested
for rabies. If the bat is unavailable, the need for PEP should be assessed
by public health officials. PEP should be considered after direct contact
between a human and a bat, unless the exposed person can be certain a bite,
scratch, or mucous membrane exposure did not occur. PEP may be considered
for persons who were in the same room as a bat and who might be unaware
that a bite or direct contact had occurred (e.g., when a sleeping person
wakes to find a bat in the room or an adult witnesses a bat in the room
with an unattended child, mentally disabled person, or intoxicated person).
PEP is not warranted when direct contact between a human and a bat did
not occur. Seeing a bat or being in the vicinity of bats does not constitute
an exposure
-
rarely, if ever, do non-bite exposures, including scratches, contamination
of an open wound, or direct mucus membrane contact with infectious material
(such as saliva or neuronal tissue) cause rabies. Rabies, a Lyssavirus,
normally affects the neurological tissue. However, the virus is most often
transmitted through saliva or contact with oral or gastric mucosaref.
Additionally, rabies virus also has been detected in the kidney, prostate,
pancreas, and other tissues and body fluids (Debbie JG, Trimarchi CV. Pantropism
of rabies virus in free-ranging rabid red fox Vulpes fulva. J Wildl
Dis 1970;6:500-6). In naturally occurring cases, the proven vehicle for
transmission is saliva and neural tissue. Anecdotal reports exist of rabies
transmission by ingestion of milk by a nursing lamb from its motherref.
However, in all of these reports, a bite or mucous membrane exposure could
not be ruled out.
-
unpasteurized milk : there are no published studies that have demonstrated
the presence of rabies virus in cows' milk. Although transmission of rabies
virus from consuming unpasteurized milk from an infected animal is theoretically
possible, no human has ever been reported to develop rabies via this route
-- apart from the cases described in Oklahoma in December 2005ref.
Most persons who consume raw milk or cream prepared from rabies virus-infected
cows are at minimal risk for rabies exposure. Infants and persons with
certain medical conditions may be at higher risk. Medical conditions that
would place a person at higher risk are those that suppress the immune
system,
cause abnormalities of the palate, or cause open sores, erosions, or ulcerations
in the mouth, throat, or esophagus. The risk of contracting rabies through
milk could be better defined if samples of milk and mammary tissue were
collected from rabid livestock and assayed for the presence, viability,
and infectivity of rabies virus. Regardless of the amount of viable rabies
virus that may be shed in cow's milk, the theoretical risk for transmission
of rabies from this route can be eliminated if all dairy products are pasteurized
before consumption. An outbreak of rabies as a result of consumption of
dairy products from rabies virus-infected cattle occurred in Bhutan since
January 2006ref
-
hematogenous spread does not occur
-
aerosols : under most circumstances, there is no danger of aerosol transmission
of rabies. However, aerosol transmission has occurred under very specialized
conditions in which
the air contains a high concentration of suspended particles or droplets
carrying viral particles. Such conditions have been responsible for laboratory
transmission under less than ideal containment situations. There has also
been documented aerosol transmission in one bat cave. Oral and nasal secretions
containing virus were probably aerosolized from tens of millions of bats.
Aerosol infection may occur via direct attachment of the virus to olfactory
nerve endings.
-
healthcare-associated transmission : the risk is extremely low; transmission
of rabies virus from infected patients to health-care providers has not
been documentedref.
The use of Standard Precautionsref
for contact with blood and body fluids (for example, gloves, gown, mask,
goggles, or face shield as indicated for the type of patient contact) prevents
exposure to the rabies virus.
-
human-to-human transmission of rabies among household contacts : no laboratory-confirmed
cases of have been reportedref.
-
fomites or environmental surfaces : no cases of rabies have been reported
Routes of possible exposure include percutaneous and mucocutaneous entry
of the rabies virus through a wound, non-intact skin, or mucous membrane
contact. Intact skin contact with infectious materials is not considered
an exposure to the rabies virus. Types of exposures in domestic settings
for which administration of PEP would be appropriate include bites, sexual
activity, exchanging kisses on the mouth or other direct mucous membrane
contact with saliva, and sharing eating or drinking utensils or cigarettes.
In health-care settings, additional opportunities that can lead to contamination
of mucous membranes or non-intact skin with oral secretions include procedures
such as intubation or suctioning of respiratory secretions or injuries
with sharp instruments (needlesticks or scalpel cuts). Percutaneous injuries
(as from needlesticks) are considered exposures because of potential contact
with nervous tissue. Contact with patient fluids (such as blood, urine,
or feces) does not pose a risk for rabies exposureref.
-
transplantation from infected donor : rabies testing is not part of the
routine screening processref.
To decrease the risk of this happening again, one of the questions that
should be asked before organs are harvested for transplant is whether the
potential donor has traveled in a rabies endemic country within the last
3 to 6 months
-
solid organ transplantation

-
lungs, kidneys, liver and a segment of iliac artery were recovered from
an Arkansas resident who had reported being bitten by a bat and died from
SAH in June 2004 after visiting 2 hospitals in Texas and were later
transplanted on 4 May 2004 into 5 recipients (the liver, kidneys, and segment
of iliac artery at the Baylor University Medical Center (BUMC) in Dallas,
Texas to a man with ESLD, a female with ESRD caused by DM and HTX, a male
with ESRD caused by FSGS and a man with ESLD receiving liver from an uninfected
donor (the circumstances suggest that rabies virus may have passed from
the infected artery tissue to the brain of the organ recipient by a non-neural
route); the lungs in an Alabama hospital), one of whom (the lung transplant
patient) died during transplant surgery, while the remaining 4 developed
encephalitis and died. No other organs or tissues were recovered from the
donor, and the donor did not receive any blood products before death)
-
in Neu-Isenburg the Deutsche Stiftung Organ-transplantation
(DSO, German Organ Transplantation Foundation; Federal Organ Procurement
Agency) announces that 3 patients suspected of having rabies may have
been infected through organ transplants (lungs, combined kidney/pancreas,
and kidney) performed in 3 German transplant centers (Hanover, Marburg,
Hannovers Muenden) at the end of 2004-Jan 2005. These 3 recipients have
been hospitalized with suspected rabies encephalitis within 6 weeks and
are in extremely critical condition. 3 other patients who received the
liver and the corneas from the same donor and who were transplanted in
Heidelberg and Mainz are well. The donor was a 26-years old woman who was
hospitalized in December 2004 without symptoms of rabies : the patient
contacted at least 3 hospitals because of her "mysterious" illness in the
last weeks before her death. This included neurology (because of severe
headache) and psychiatry (because of aggressive/bizarre behavior) and a
recent examination of her brain showed typical signs of the disease. How
the woman may have contracted rabies was unclear, but she had been in India
in October 2004. For several reasons, predominantly travel to a malaria-endemic
country, the organ donor would have been disqualified as a blood donor
according to German legislation. She suffered a cardiac arrest that led
to cerebral ischemia despite resuscitation measures that transiently stabilized
her circulation. The last 2 deaths from rabies in Germany occurred in 1996
and 2004, and both patients caught the disease abroadref.
In 2 of the patients who received organs from this donor, the rabies virus
was isolated by means of molecular biological tests. It is thus obvious
that these recipients have been infected. In another recipient, the neutralization
test identified rabies-specific antibodies. This result may also be due
to an earlier exposure to the virus and thus does not provide clear-cut
evidence of an acute rabies infection. All health professionals who were
involved in the transplants or caring for the patients have been identified
and inoculatedref.
In March 2005, the 70-year-old man who received the donor's kidney died,
along with the patient who received a lung from the woman : on April 7
the 45-yo man who received the other kidney and the pancreas died, too.
-
corneal allograft
(8 recipients of transplanted corneas in 5 countriesref)
: success has been achieved in detecting virus in implants and initiating
PEP within 24 hours of transplantation
Pathogenesis :
replication in skeletal muscle cells (
Negri
bodies
)
=> peripheral nerves => salivary glands, pancreas and adrenal glands
ref.
Rabies did not permanently damage any brain structure. Instead, death comes
because the virus seems to cause temporary dysfunction of brain centers
that control critical functions like breathing and swallowing.
=>
rabies
(a.k.a.
lissa in Italy) after > 10 days (one reliably recorded case
of rabies in a human had an incubation period >6 years) : the development
of rabies generally takes 10 to 90 days when the virus is transmitted through
a bite
ref.
-
excitation or furious stage : aerophoby and hydrophoby (spasm of
deglutition muscles at sight of water), convulsions due to encephalitis
,
alterations of heart and breath rates, urinary retention and constipation
.
Respiratory
failuire
may lead to death within 4-5 days
-
(paralytic stage : apathy, exitus due to heart
failure
)
-
relaxed stage : coma

Laboratory
examinations : antemortem diagnostic samples consist of a full-thickness
skin biopsy (4 to 6 mm in diameter) from the nape of the neck, fresh saliva,
serum, and CSF. Although postmortem rabies diagnosis can be performed on
formalin-fixed brain material, fresh brain material provides the optimal
sample for maximum sensitivity, specificity, and time efficiency. Rabies
virus antigen is detected by a modification of the direct fluorescent antibody
test
ref
Preventionref
:
-
travelers to endemic countries are advised to avoid contact with dogs and
other animals, and rabies pre-exposure prophylaxis (consisting of
3 intramuscular doses of killed
rabies vaccine
on days 0, 7, and 21 or 28) is recommended for persons planning to stay
longer than 30 days in remote areas without access to medical facilitiesref.
2 kinds of oral vaccine bait are used for raccoons : an extrusion of fish
meal with a hole in the centre containing a vaccine-filled sachet and sachets
simply coated with fish meal. Surrent vaccines (all derived from canine
rabies) do provide protection against bat rabies viruses
-
rabies postexposure prophylaxis (RPEP)ref
: human rabies is preventable if the exposure is recognized and the patient
receives appropriate wound care and postexposure prophylaxis before clinical
signs of rabies are evident. RPEP consists of rabies immune globulin (homologous
immune antiserum
)
infiltrated at the site of the exposure (bite) and 1 dose of killed
rabies vaccine
administered in the deltoid (or anterolateral thigh of infants and small
children) on days 0, 3, 7, 14, and 28ref.
When applied appropriately, this combination has been effective in preventing
death after an exposure. PEP is recommended for all persons with a bite,
scratch, or mucous-membrane exposure to a bat, unless the bat tests negative
for rabies. When direct contact between a human and a bat has occurred
and the animal is not available for testing, PEP should be administered
when a strong probability of exposure exists. However, if a bat bite is
unrecognized or if the significance of exposure is underestimated, medical
intervention might not be sought and appropriate treatment not administered.
Persons bitten by a potentially rabid animal should immediately :
-
wash the wound thoroughly with soap and water
-
capture the animal (if this can be done safely by avoiding direct contact)
and submit it for testing or quarantine
-
contact local or state public health officials
-
visit a physician for treatment and evaluation regarding the need for PEP.
Persons should not handle or keep bats as pets and should keep bats away
from living quarters and public places.Previous reports of rabies cases
have noted large numbers of contacts being treatedref;
however, delivery of health care to a patient with rabies is not an indication
for PEP unless the mucuous membranes or open wound of a health-care worker
are contaminated by infectious material (e.g., saliva, tears, CSF, or neurologic
tissue). Adherence to standard precautions for infection control will minimize
the risk for exposureref.
Several aspects of post-exposure prophylaxis also need mentioning :
-
immediate and extensive washing of all bite wounds and scratches with soap
and water and a virucidal agent such as povidine-iodine irrigation are
important in preventing rabies. Indeed, in animals, this alone reduces
the likelihood of rabies markedlyref1,
ref2.
-
small rodents (such as squirrels, hamsters, guinea pigs, chipmunks, rats,
and mice) as well as lagomorphs (rabbits and hares) are almost never found
to be infected with rabies and have not been known to transmit rabies to
humans. The woodchuck, quite a large rodent, accounts for most rodent rabies
in endemic areas of rabies.
-
much of the rabies prophylaxis is given related to dog and cat bites. This
can be minimized by immunizing one's pets against this infection.
-
HRIG has always been located in town even if it is not in stock at the
institution that requires it
-
vaccination of foxes in western Europe has successfully contained the spread
of rabies virus and eliminated human and animal rabies throughout much
of western Europe using vaccines distributed in baits attractive for the
target species. This report gives a graphic account of the ongoing and
largely successful program to control and eliminate raccoon rabies in the
state of West Virginia. Control of rabies transmission from terrestrial
animals to other terrestrial animals and humans is now a successful, although
expensive, procedure for rabies control to such an extent that aerial bats
have become the predominant transmitters of rabies in the United States
and elsewhere. A graph depicting detection of raccoon rabies by year in
the US and Canada from 1977 to 1999ref
Therapy : behavioural
or histopathological examination of the vector for > 10 days, cleaning
wound with water & soap, ethanol 40-70%, benzalchonium chloride 0.1%,
therapeutical
killed vaccine
.
The approach to management of the rabies normally should be palliative.
In unusual circumstances, a decision may be made to use an aggressive approach
to therapy for patients who present at an early stage of clinical disease.
No specific course of treatment for rabies in humans has been demonstrated
to be effective, but a combination of treatments, which might include
killed
rabies vaccine
,
homologous
immune antiserum
,
monoclonal antibodies,
ribavirin
,
IFN-a
,
or ketamine, has been proposed. Corticosteroids should not be used
ref.
Prognosis : historically,
the mortality rate among previously unvaccinated rabies patients has been
100% once symptoms develop
ref.
Only 6 cases of human recovery after rabies infection and onset of symptoms
have been described :
-
5 people were either previously vaccinated or received some form of PEP
before the onset of symptoms. Viral antigen was not detected nor was virus
isolated from those patients; increased antibody titers detected in serum
and CSF (inconsistent with vaccination alone) confirmed the diagnosis of
clinical rabies
-
1966ref
-
1972 : the only one of the 5 patients recovered without neurologic sequelaeref
-
1978 : a 45-year-old woman from Mendoza, Argentina, was severely bitten
by a dog that died 4 days later. Before death, the dog was nervous, aggressive,
and had occasional seizures. Ten days after the woman had been bitten,
rabies vaccine treatment was begun: 14 daily doses of suckling mouse brain
vaccine followed by 2 booster doses. Twenty-one days after the biting episode,
she developed a cerebellar striatal syndrome, which persisted throughout
several months, and severe encephalitic symptoms, which persisted for 75
days. After 13 months, recovery was nearly complete. The patient's serum
and CSF contained rabies-neutralizing antibodies reaching maximum titers
of 1:640 000 and 1:160 000, respectively. Titers of this magnitude have
never been previusly recorded after suckling mouse brain vaccine treatmentref.
-
1994 : a 9-year-old boy from Mexicoref
-
2002 : a partial recovery in a 6-year-old girlref
-
in a unique case the patient received no rabies prophylaxis either before
or after illness onset. 15-year-old Jeanna Giese from Fond du Lac, Wisconsin,
USA, was infected when she was bitten by a bat while at a church service
on 12 Sep 2004. She did not visit a doctor and so didn't received RPEP,
as is standard medical practice for such an exposure. The bite was quick
and small, so the girl thought she had just been scratched. Her fellow
churchgoers assumed that only healthy bats could fly, so they picked it
up after it flew into a window and threw it out the door. She began showing
rabies symptoms on 13 Oct and on 18 Oct, she was admitted to the hospital
with fluctuating consciousness, slurred speech and other symptoms typical
of full-blown rabies. The original description of the bat attack suggested
that the rabid bat was not preserved. This is unfortunate, because isolation
of rabies virus from this animal might establish whether the genome of
the virus carried any attenuating mutations that might have played a role
in the survival of the patient. The treatment includes 2 anesthetics and
2 antiviral medications. The history of a bat bite one month before this
patient's illness suggests an etiology of bat-associated rabies virus variant.
This is consistent with the epidemiologic pattern of rabies in humans in
the USA during the preceding 2 decades. Treatment included induction of
coma while a native immune response matured; rabies vaccine was not administered.
Clinical management of the patient consisted of supportive care and neuroprotective
measures, including a drug-induced coma and ventilator support. The patient
was treated with ketamine
,
midazolam
,
ribavirin
,
and amantadine
.
Probable drug-related toxic effects included hemolysis, pancreatitis, acidosis,
and hepatotoxicity. Lumbar puncture after 8 days showed an increased level
of rabies antibody, and sedation was tapered. Paresis and sensory denervation
then resolved. Intravenous ribavirin was used under an investigational
protocol. Given the lack of therapeutic utility observed to date, and because
the patient had rabies virus-neutralizing antibodies on diagnosis, a decision
was made to avoid use of immune-modulators (e.g., rabies vaccine, rabies
immune globulin, or interferon). The patient was kept comatose for 7 days;
during that period, results from lumbar puncture indicated an increase
in antirabies IgG by immunofluorescent assay from 1:32 to 1:2048. Her coma
medications were tapered, and the patient became increasingly alert. On
the 33rd day of illness, she was extubated; 3 days later she was transferred
to a rehabilitation unit. At the time of transfer, she was unable to speak
after prolonged intubation. She was able to walk with assistance, ride
a stationary cycle for 8 minutes, and feed herself a soft, solid diet.
She solved math puzzles, used sign language, and was regaining the ability
to speak. The prognosis for her full recovery is unknown. Her parents said
she stood up for the first time on Nov 23 and recognizes people when they
came in the room. The patient was removed from isolation after 31 days
and discharged to her home after 76 days. At nearly 5 months after her
initial hospitalization, she was alert and communicative, but with choreoathetosis,
dysarthria, and an unsteady gaitref.
Even if the girl's treatment proves successful in a 2nd patient, it is
not clear how widely it could be used in poorer parts of the world, since
it requires an intensive care unit, with all its high technology. Clinicians
and the public should recognize the risk for contracting rabies from any
direct contact with bats and not regard it as a curable disease on the
basis of the outcome of this caseref.
Artificial hibernation, was introduced in 1952 by a French Navy Surgeon,
Henri Laborit, who demonstrated, for the 1st time, the use of chlorpromazine
to tranquilize patients without sedation. Subsequently, Laborit devoted
himself to research and became the leader in therapy of psychotropic syndromes.
He received the Albert Lasker prize in 1957. In 1958, Laborit opened the
Laboratory of Eutonologie, at the Boucicaut Hospital in Paris. He directed
this laboratory until his death in 1995. Artificial hibernation was also
used in Viet Nam to treat patients recovering from surgery, or undergoing
severe post-traumatic shock, or suffering from massive septicemia. The
usual lytic cocktail consisted of a mixture of Largactil-Phenergan-Dolosal,
and it was believed that the induced hypothermia would depress the defense
mechanisms of the patient and inhibit, at least for a while, the active
participation of organs, thus minimizing large expenditures of energy.
Having lost a very close friend to rabies, who was not given the possible
benefit of artificial hibernation, I find it marvelous that the procedure
was resurrected successfully to treat this recent rabies patient, and Dr.
Willoughby should be praised for his courageous initiativeref
-
in 2006-2007 there were 3 cases (a 73-year-old man in March 2007) recording
lack of success in treatment of post-exposure rabies according to the Wisconsin
protocol
Web resources
:
RABNET at WHO